Review: Research Notes and a Short Presentation
Apply sort a note by report role, record a source locator, choose a visual aid, answer a clarifying question using supplied texts and original responses.
Bring the unit skills together
Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.
The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.
Use the skills in a new task
Make a short complete response demonstrating the four skills in this unit. Prepare a one-minute paper presentation from this fictional record: two books, one paper sheet; fold the sheet and bridge the books; the model held three blocks before bending. Use Materials, Procedure and Observations headings, a labeled sketch and a source note Fictional Model Record, section 1. State that thicker paper was not tested. Longer writing targets in optional extensions can be completed in a later session.
Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.
- Identify the note’s content before placing it under a heading. Keep results separate from steps and questions.
- Write the source title exactly as supplied and include its page or section. Retain that locator beside the note.
- Match the aid to what listeners need to see. Give it readable labels rather than merely decorating the page.
- Identify what the question asks and respond only with the corresponding supplied information. Admit when the record does not answer it.
Compare with a model response
Materials: two books and one paper sheet. Procedure: fold the sheet and bridge the books. Observations: the model held three blocks before bending. Source: Fictional Model Record, section 1. My sketch labels paper and the two supports. I would say these three headings aloud and point out that thicker paper was not tested. That unknown belongs in a follow-up question, not in the results.
A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.