Write an explanatory ending

Supplied materials

• Paper and pencil, or a browser text area. All named people/events/records are fictional learning inputs.
• Worked case: Excerpt A: A paper hinge is a movable connection between two cardboard panels. Excerpt B: A crease guides the paper’s bend; because the bend stays at that line, the attached panels can change angle. Excerpt C: Define crease for new readers: a pressed fold line in the paper. Excerpt D: The parts, crease and movement together explain how this model’s hinge works.
• Primary check: Excerpt A: A paper hinge is unlike a rigid brace: the hinge permits movement while the brace resists it in this model. Excerpt B: In what order were the folds tested? Trial Card A records fold, return, inspect, repeated five times. Excerpt C: The distance was 2 centimeters, not merely 2 without a unit. Excerpt D: This test ended at five bends; what happens after twenty remains an open question.

Learn the idea

An explanation can close by synthesizing, acknowledging a question or stating an implication that follows from its content. An unrelated assertion breaks coherence.

Compare the ending’s information with the established paragraphs. Identify its connection and whether its implication stays within evidence.

Original worked input: Original excerpt D: The parts, crease and movement together explain how this model’s hinge works. The task is to write an explanatory ending. The answer is “synthesizes the established explanation”. Evidence: The parts, crease and movement together explain how this model’s hinge works. Reasoning: synthesizes the established explanation is supported because parts and motion are gathered into the explanation already developed. A conclusion is not a place to invent a result.

1. Read the supplied worked case and identify the part named in this lesson. An adult can model unfamiliar words.
2. Compare the ending’s information with the established paragraphs. Identify its connection and whether its implication stays within evidence.
3. Check the worked solution: synthesizes the established explanation. Evidence: The parts, crease and movement together explain how this model’s hinge works. Reasoning: synthesizes the established explanation is supported because parts and motion are gathered into the explanation already developed. A conclusion is not a place to invent a result.
4. Use the new primary and practice cases. Give a reason from the actual words before checking the feedback.

Check your reasoning

Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.

Take it further

Changed-input task: Original excerpt D: The observed fold can explain this prototype’s movement under the trial conditions, with wider durability left unclaimed. Give an evidence-based answer before looking at the model. Expected reasoning: Evidence: The observed fold can explain this prototype’s movement under the trial conditions, with wider durability left unclaimed. Reasoning: explains a bounded implication is supported because the implication is tied to this prototype and trial rather than all future use. A conclusion is not a place to invent a result. Then write a brief alternative sentence, paragraph, source note or scene that demonstrates the same operation; label new fictional details and preserve source limits.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.