Grade 8 · lesson 4 of 4

Change One Feature in a Test

A controlled design comparison holds other defined features constant while changing the selected feature.

About 20 minutes, plus any extended practice

Download the grade pack

Supplied materials

  • Paper and a pencil, typed notes or a browser scratch area. Color names can replace colored supplies; drawn figures and timelines can replace performance.
  • Complete teaching inputs: An original design test changes only title size; all other defined features and the audience task are held constant. What comparison is best scoped to that setup? Supplied candidates: (A) Change all other features too and attribute any result to one feature (B) Claim the maker’s intention is proved by every response (C) Compare the stated criterion while noting the changed title size (D) Report preference as certified accessibility compliance.
  • Independent check: An original design test changes only margin width; all other defined features and the audience task are held constant. What comparison is best scoped to that setup? Supplied candidates: (A) Change all other features too and attribute any result to one feature (B) Claim the maker’s intention is proved by every response (C) Compare the stated criterion while noting the changed margin width (D) Report preference as certified accessibility compliance.

Learn the idea

Treat an original media plan as an evidence record. Arrange image transitions, preserve source and rights status, reconcile multiple commission constraints and design a controlled comparison that tests one defined feature. A controlled design comparison holds other defined features constant while changing the selected feature. This makes a subsequent observation easier to relate to the intended difference.

Reason through the supplied case: Holding the other specified features constant makes title size the documented design change. A comparison can examine a stated outcome or brief criterion, but needs actual observations before reporting responses; a plan alone does not generate evidence.

Planning a comparison does not supply results or prove causation. Actual task observations would still be needed before claiming users found one design better.

  1. Read the complete teaching inputs and mark the feature, rule or constraint being tested.
  2. Compare the model decision with one rejected candidate; state the visible evidence or calculation that distinguishes them.
  3. Solve the independent check and the three changed-input practice cases before reading feedback.
  4. Make two title layouts differing only in title size; record which features stayed fixed and a proposed visibility task.
  5. Check your artifact against these explicit criteria: The title size alone changes, the fixed features are named and no observation or outcome is invented.
Worked example

See the method in action

An original design test changes only title size; all other defined features and the audience task are held constant. What comparison is best scoped to that setup? Supplied candidates: (A) Change all other features too and attribute any result to one feature (B) Claim the maker’s intention is proved by every response (C) Compare the stated criterion while noting the changed title size (D) Report preference as certified accessibility compliance. Model decision: Compare the stated criterion while noting the changed title size. Holding the other specified features constant makes title size the documented design change. A comparison can examine a stated outcome or brief criterion, but needs actual observations before reporting responses; a plan alone does not generate evidence.

Your turn

Check your reasoning

Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.

Helpful tips
  • A controlled design comparison holds other defined features constant while changing the selected feature.
  • Planning a comparison does not supply results or prove causation.
An original design test changes only margin width; all other defined features and the audience task are held constant. What comparison is best scoped to that setup?

Feedback appears here after you check. This is practice, not a graded school assessment.

See the answer and explanation

Compare the stated criterion while noting the changed margin width

Holding the other specified features constant makes margin width the documented design change. A comparison can examine a stated outcome or brief criterion, but needs actual observations before reporting responses; a plan alone does not generate evidence.

Take it further

New-input analysis: An original design test changes only symbol shape; all other defined features and the audience task are held constant. What comparison is best scoped to that setup? Supplied candidates: (A) Change all other features too and attribute any result to one feature (B) Claim the maker’s intention is proved by every response (C) Compare the stated criterion while noting the changed symbol shape (D) Report preference as certified accessibility compliance. Expected relationship: Compare the stated criterion while noting the changed symbol shape. Holding the other specified features constant makes symbol shape the documented design change. A comparison can examine a stated outcome or brief criterion, but needs actual observations before reporting responses; a plan alone does not generate evidence. Create your own artifact: Make two title layouts differing only in title size; record which features stayed fixed and a proposed visibility task. Completion criteria: The title size alone changes, the fixed features are named and no observation or outcome is invented.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.

More practice: try new cases

Choose an answer for each problem. Explain your method on paper, then use the feedback to decide what to revisit.

More practice: try new cases
1. An original design test changes only line thickness; all other defined features and the audience task are held constant. What comparison is best scoped to that setup?
Need a hint?
  • A controlled design comparison holds other defined features constant while changing the selected feature.
  • Planning a comparison does not supply results or prove causation.
2. An original design test changes only image placement; all other defined features and the audience task are held constant. What comparison is best scoped to that setup?
Need a hint?
  • A controlled design comparison holds other defined features constant while changing the selected feature.
  • Planning a comparison does not supply results or prove causation.
3. An original design test changes only caption length; all other defined features and the audience task are held constant. What comparison is best scoped to that setup?
Need a hint?
  • A controlled design comparison holds other defined features constant while changing the selected feature.
  • Planning a comparison does not supply results or prove causation.

Your choices are temporary. Feedback appears after you check all the answers.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. Keep your own notes or download them before leaving. The score describes these questions; it does not certify subject mastery.

Check the subject sources

These LifeStarter passages, scenarios and exercises are authored for this Academy with AI assistance and review. External resources keep their publishers’ terms. A grade label suggests a starting level; it does not establish alignment with your school’s complete requirements.