Review: Montage, Source Records, Constraints, and Comparisons
Treat an original media plan as an evidence record. Arrange image transitions, preserve source and rights status, reconcile multiple commission constraints and design a controlled comparison that tests one defined feature.
Bring the unit skills together
Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.
The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.
Use the skills in a new task
Complete this four-part arts evidence sheet. 1. The original edit brief wants viewers to compare a problem with a visible revision: dim figure, then distinct figure. Which pair order carries that stated relation? Supplied candidates: (A) dim figure → dim figure (B) dim figure → distinct figure (C) distinct figure → dim figure (D) distinct figure → distinct figure. Then Create three panels showing a crowded title, a layout move and the title in clear space. Criteria: The sequence preserves the stated before/change/after relation and the caption avoids claiming an untested audience effect. 2. A fictional asset record states “recording rights unknown.” A public display is proposed. Which preparation respects that actual recorded scope? Supplied candidates: (A) Assume every online item is unrestricted (B) Delete provenance and call the asset original (C) Treat source credit as automatic permission for any use (D) Use the supplied original text/paper alternative while investigating the recording. Then Create a fictional two-item source log, one original and one marked rights unresolved, then state a safe project decision. Criteria: The original is accurately credited, the uncertain status remains visible, and the plan uses the original until the unresolved item is checked. 3. A fictional commission brief allows at most5 panels and 17 planning minutes, and requires captions. Which supplied plan satisfies all three constraints? Supplied candidates: (A) 5 panels, 10 minutes, all required captions included (B) 5 panels, 17 minutes, no captions (C) 5 panels, 18 minutes, captions included (D) 6 panels, 17 minutes, captions included. Then Write a proposal for a three-panel paper piece within twenty minutes that includes a caption on every panel. Criteria: Panel and time limits are respected and all three caption requirements are included. 4. An original design test changes only symbol shape; all other defined features and the audience task are held constant. What comparison is best scoped to that setup? Supplied candidates: (A) Change all other features too and attribute any result to one feature (B) Claim the maker’s intention is proved by every response (C) Compare the stated criterion while noting the changed symbol shape (D) Report preference as certified accessibility compliance. Then Make two title layouts differing only in title size; record which features stayed fixed and a proposed visibility task. Criteria: The title size alone changes, the fixed features are named and no observation or outcome is invented.
Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.
- Answer each supplied changed-input analysis with its visible evidence, rule or calculation.
- Include the original artifact required for each lesson; paper/text equivalents are acceptable.
- Apply the stated criteria and document one concrete revision.
- Describe planning/analysis accurately; do not claim unobserved musical, acting or dance execution.
Compare with a model response
1. dim figure → distinct figure. The first image establishes the supplied problem, and the second makes its stated revision visible. The sequence supports a before-and-after comparison; it does not alone show causation beyond the fictional record or guarantee every viewer’s interpretation. An original artifact is acceptable when The sequence preserves the stated before/change/after relation and the caption avoids claiming an untested audience effect. 2. Use the supplied original text/paper alternative while investigating the recording. The proposed action retains the actual status “recording rights unknown” rather than inventing broader permission. A CC0 marker concerns copyright and can leave relevant third-party rights questions. Attribution and permission are distinct. All records are fictional; no external image, recording or real legal decision is required. An original artifact is acceptable when The original is accurately credited, the uncertain status remains visible, and the plan uses the original until the unresolved item is checked. 3. 5 panels, 10 minutes, all required captions included. The selected plan has no more than 5 panels, takes no more than 17 minutes and includes captions. The other candidates violate one different requirement. Feasibility follows the supplied brief, not whether an outside client will accept the artwork. An original artifact is acceptable when Panel and time limits are respected and all three caption requirements are included. 4. Compare the stated criterion while noting the changed symbol shape. Holding the other specified features constant makes symbol shape the documented design change. A comparison can examine a stated outcome or brief criterion, but needs actual observations before reporting responses; a plan alone does not generate evidence. An original artifact is acceptable when The title size alone changes, the fixed features are named and no observation or outcome is invented.
A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.