Review: Explanations, Arguments and Information Displays
Apply identify informational purpose, distinguish claim, reason and evidence, interpret a display’s organization, explain a qualifying word using supplied texts and original responses.
Bring the unit skills together
Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.
The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.
Use the skills in a new task
Make a short complete response demonstrating the four skills in this unit. Write an original explanation of a fictional folding model and a separate argument for clearer labels. Supplied record: four volunteers, three asked for the hinge name during May. Use claim, reason and evidence explicitly; keep the volunteer/date limits and select a parts diagram. Longer writing targets in optional extensions can be completed in a later session.
Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.
- Find the stated aim and the action the writer asks of a reader, if any. Name the matching purpose.
- Use the supplied argument context and classify the sentence’s role. Explain how it connects to the position.
- Identify the relation readers need to see. Use that relation to choose the display, then include required labels.
- Read the exact expression and say which part of the claim it narrows. Preserve that limit in a summary.
Compare with a model response
The fictional model has two panels joined by folded paper. First the panels are placed beside each other; next the fold connects them. We should label the hinge because readers need to identify the connection: three of four volunteers asked its name during May. A parts diagram would show that location. The evidence concerns those volunteers and dates, so it does not prove every visitor will need the same help.
A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.