Distinguish claim, reason and evidence

Supplied materials

• Paper and pencil, or a browser text area. All named people/events/records are fictional learning inputs.
• Worked case: Excerpt A: A paper hinge lets two panels move: the fold bends while the panels remain joined. Excerpt B: We should label each part. Without names, a reader cannot connect our instructions to the model. Excerpt C: 1890: first design; 1902: revised design; 1910: public display. Readers need to see the order and gaps. Excerpt D: The fold sometimes catches on the cardboard edge.
• Primary check: Excerpt A: Add labels to the model. Three of four visitors asked which part was the hinge, so clearer names deserve a trial. Excerpt B: We should label parts because readers need to connect the instructions to the correct pieces. Analyze the because-clause. Excerpt C: Model A uses cardboard and paper; model B uses wood and cloth. Readers need to compare both material categories. Excerpt D: In this sample of four volunteers, three asked for the hinge name.

Learn the idea

A claim states the position, a reason explains why it should hold and evidence supplies supporting observations or source details. A relevant link is needed between all three.

Use the supplied argument context and classify the sentence’s role. Explain how it connects to the position.

Original worked input: Original excerpt B: We should label each part. Without names, a reader cannot connect our instructions to the model. The task is to distinguish claim, reason and evidence. The answer is “claim”. Evidence: We should label each part. Without names, a reader cannot connect our instructions to the model. Reasoning: claim is supported because the sentence states the position the writer wants accepted. An unrelated true detail does not support this claim.

1. Read the supplied worked case and identify the part named in this lesson. An adult can model unfamiliar words.
2. Use the supplied argument context and classify the sentence’s role. Explain how it connects to the position.
3. Check the worked solution: claim. Evidence: We should label each part. Without names, a reader cannot connect our instructions to the model. Reasoning: claim is supported because the sentence states the position the writer wants accepted. An unrelated true detail does not support this claim.
4. Use the new primary and practice cases. Give a reason from the actual words before checking the feedback.

Check your reasoning

Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.

Take it further

Changed-input task: Original excerpt B: Add labels to this model. Three volunteers could not identify its hinge from the drawing alone. Analyze the first sentence. Give an evidence-based answer before looking at the model. Expected reasoning: Evidence: Add labels to this model. Three volunteers could not identify its hinge from the drawing alone. Analyze the first sentence. Reasoning: claim is supported because the sentence states the position the writer wants accepted. An unrelated true detail does not support this claim. Then write a brief alternative sentence, paragraph, source note or scene that demonstrates the same operation; label new fictional details and preserve source limits.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.