Propose a Bounded Original Capstone
A complete capstone proposal names its artifact, numerical limits and revision evidence.
About 25 minutes, plus any extended practice
Supplied materials
- Paper and a pencil, typed notes or a browser scratch area. Color names can replace colored supplies; drawn figures and timelines can replace performance.
- Complete teaching inputs: Original capstone brief: use at most 3 paper pages, stay within 20 planning minutes, include an original artifact and a criterion-based revision note. Which proposal satisfies the supplied constraints? Supplied candidates: (A) 3 pages, 18 minutes, artifact plus documented revision (B) A promise of guaranteed audience impact without an artifact (C) One extra page beyond the cap with no revision note (D) Only an uncredited copied image.
- Independent check: Original capstone brief: use at most4 paper pages, stay within 21 planning minutes, include an original artifact and a criterion-based revision note. Which proposal satisfies the supplied constraints? Supplied candidates: (A) 4 pages, 19 minutes, artifact plus documented revision (B) A promise of guaranteed audience impact without an artifact (C) One extra page beyond the cap with no revision note (D) Only an uncredited copied image.
Learn the idea
Prepare an original capstone that is feasible and honestly documented. Reconcile limits with required evidence, distinguish artifact work from unobserved performance, retain provenance and reserve time for a specific criterion-based revision. A complete capstone proposal names its artifact, numerical limits and revision evidence. Reconcile those conditions in one feasible plan rather than promising an undefined large production.
Reason through the supplied case: The proposal stays within both numerical limits and includes the two required evidence types. A valid plan does not ensure artistic quality by itself; the artifact and revision reasoning must still be produced and reviewed against transparent criteria.
A valid proposal is still a plan, not a finished artwork or verified audience outcome. Its artifact and revision must actually be produced before the portfolio reports completion.
- Read the complete teaching inputs and mark the feature, rule or constraint being tested.
- Compare the model decision with one rejected candidate; state the visible evidence or calculation that distinguishes them.
- Solve the independent check and the three changed-input practice cases before reading feedback.
- Propose a three-page original storyboard within twenty-five planning minutes, including a source log and criterion-based revision note.
- Check your artifact against these explicit criteria: The proposal names the artifact, respects both limits and allocates work for the source and revision evidence.
See the method in action
Original capstone brief: use at most 3 paper pages, stay within 20 planning minutes, include an original artifact and a criterion-based revision note. Which proposal satisfies the supplied constraints? Supplied candidates: (A) 3 pages, 18 minutes, artifact plus documented revision (B) A promise of guaranteed audience impact without an artifact (C) One extra page beyond the cap with no revision note (D) Only an uncredited copied image. Model decision: 3 pages, 18 minutes, artifact plus documented revision. The proposal stays within both numerical limits and includes the two required evidence types. A valid plan does not ensure artistic quality by itself; the artifact and revision reasoning must still be produced and reviewed against transparent criteria.
Check your reasoning
Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.
Helpful tips
- A complete capstone proposal names its artifact, numerical limits and revision evidence.
- A valid proposal is still a plan, not a finished artwork or verified audience outcome.
See the answer and explanation
4 pages, 19 minutes, artifact plus documented revision
The proposal stays within both numerical limits and includes the two required evidence types. A valid plan does not ensure artistic quality by itself; the artifact and revision reasoning must still be produced and reviewed against transparent criteria.
Take it further
New-input analysis: Original capstone brief: use at most4 paper pages, stay within 27 planning minutes, include an original artifact and a criterion-based revision note. Which proposal satisfies the supplied constraints? Supplied candidates: (A) 4 pages, 25 minutes, artifact plus documented revision (B) A promise of guaranteed audience impact without an artifact (C) One extra page beyond the cap with no revision note (D) Only an uncredited copied image. Expected relationship: 4 pages, 25 minutes, artifact plus documented revision. The proposal stays within both numerical limits and includes the two required evidence types. A valid plan does not ensure artistic quality by itself; the artifact and revision reasoning must still be produced and reviewed against transparent criteria. Create your own artifact: Propose a three-page original storyboard within twenty-five planning minutes, including a source log and criterion-based revision note. Completion criteria: The proposal names the artifact, respects both limits and allocates work for the source and revision evidence.
Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.
More practice: try new cases
Choose an answer for each problem. Explain your method on paper, then use the feedback to decide what to revisit.
Your choices are temporary. Feedback appears after you check all the answers.
Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. Keep your own notes or download them before leaving. The score describes these questions; it does not certify subject mastery.
Check the subject sources
- Getty Museum: Principles of Design
- Getty Museum: Understanding Formal Analysis
- Smithsonian Institution: Open Access FAQ
- National Core Arts Standards: framework and artistic processes
These LifeStarter passages, scenarios and exercises are authored for this Academy with AI assistance and review. External resources keep their publishers’ terms. A grade label suggests a starting level; it does not establish alignment with your school’s complete requirements.