Record research process decisions

Supplied materials

• Paper and pencil, or a browser text area. All named people/events/records are fictional learning inputs.
• Worked case: Excerpt A: Supplied key: Lee—Hinge Note, 2026, p. 2. The note should link Lee and Hinge Note to the reference entry. Excerpt B: Revision A says five bends; revision B corrects the text to six bends. The wording changed. Excerpt C: Research log: query paper hinge repeated bending; include dated test records with actual bend counts. Excerpt D: Card A records Jo’s test; Card B independently records Lea’s different test. Neither copied the other.
• Primary check: Excerpt A: Supplied key: Model Club—Test Card, 2026, section 1. The named organization authored this card. Excerpt B: A 2025 edition and a 2026 edition carry different publication dates, with no textual change supplied. Excerpt C: Research log: exclude Promotional Flyer because it has no dated trial result, the inclusion requirement. Excerpt D: Two websites reproduce the identical Trial Card A rather than conducting separate tests.

Learn the idea

A transparent research log records searches, inclusion/exclusion decisions, question changes and gaps. It helps another reader understand the process without pretending every relevant source was found.

Identify the stated decision and explain how it affects the evidence set. Keep exclusions reasoned and visible.

Original worked input: Original excerpt C: Research log: query paper hinge repeated bending; include dated test records with actual bend counts. The task is to record research process decisions. The answer is “search terms and inclusion rule”. Evidence: Research log: query paper hinge repeated bending; include dated test records with actual bend counts. Reasoning: search terms and inclusion rule is supported because a search phrase and observable inclusion requirements make retrieval choices inspectable. A search log is not a guarantee of exhaustive research.

1. Read the supplied worked case and identify the part named in this lesson. An adult can model unfamiliar words.
2. Identify the stated decision and explain how it affects the evidence set. Keep exclusions reasoned and visible.
3. Check the worked solution: search terms and inclusion rule. Evidence: Research log: query paper hinge repeated bending; include dated test records with actual bend counts. Reasoning: search terms and inclusion rule is supported because a search phrase and observable inclusion requirements make retrieval choices inspectable. A search log is not a guarantee of exhaustive research.
4. Use the new primary and practice cases. Give a reason from the actual words before checking the feedback.

Check your reasoning

Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.

Take it further

Changed-input task: Original excerpt C: Log: revise the question to dry-condition tests because no wet-condition evidence was found. Give an evidence-based answer before looking at the model. Expected reasoning: Evidence: Log: revise the question to dry-condition tests because no wet-condition evidence was found. Reasoning: revision of the research question is supported because the available evidence narrows the original question. A search log is not a guarantee of exhaustive research. Then write a brief alternative sentence, paragraph, source note or scene that demonstrates the same operation; label new fictional details and preserve source limits.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.