Choose a Relevant Revision from Evidence

Supplied materials

• Paper and a pencil, typed notes or a browser scratch area. Color names can replace colored supplies; drawn figures and timelines can replace performance.
• Complete teaching inputs: An original rehearsal-plan record reports: sound begins one count before its cue. Which revision directly addresses that evidence? Supplied candidates: (A) Change only an unrelated costume color (B) Declare the whole performance flawless (C) Invent a successful audience survey (D) Move that sound onset to the specified cue count.
• Independent check: An original rehearsal-plan record reports: caption disappears before the action ends. Which revision directly addresses that evidence? Supplied candidates: (A) Change only an unrelated costume color (B) Declare the whole performance flawless (C) Extend the caption through the action’s stated end (D) Invent a successful audience survey.

Learn the idea

Explain why a candidate satisfies its actual constraints. Analyze a supplied chord third, retain rhythm while changing one motif pitch, separate access to a shared crossing and turn a rehearsal note into a targeted revision. A rehearsal note should name a concrete mismatch between the plan and its criterion. A useful next action changes that mismatch and specifies what will be rechecked.

Reason through the supplied case: The action targets the observed mismatch, sound begins one count before its cue, and makes a specific correction that can be rechecked. The record is a supplied fictional example, not a claim that a real learner performed it; a new test is needed before reporting actual improvement.

The rehearsal records are fictional supplied examples. An appropriate planned correction is not a real successful rehearsal or audience outcome until the relevant execution is actually observed.

1. Read the complete teaching inputs and mark the feature, rule or constraint being tested.
2. Compare the model decision with one rejected candidate; state the visible evidence or calculation that distinguishes them.
3. Solve the independent check and the three changed-input practice cases before reading feedback.
4. Write a fictional note about an early sound cue, then a revised cue row and a specific timing recheck.
5. Check your artifact against these explicit criteria: The revised sound onset matches the required cue, and the record labels the later execution check as still needing observation.

Check your reasoning

Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.

Take it further

New-input analysis: An original rehearsal-plan record reports: credit line is missing from the display plan. Which revision directly addresses that evidence? Supplied candidates: (A) Add the documented maker/source credit (B) Change only an unrelated costume color (C) Declare the whole performance flawless (D) Invent a successful audience survey. Expected relationship: Add the documented maker/source credit. The action targets the observed mismatch, credit line is missing from the display plan, and makes a specific correction that can be rechecked. The record is a supplied fictional example, not a claim that a real learner performed it; a new test is needed before reporting actual improvement. Create your own artifact: Write a fictional note about an early sound cue, then a revised cue row and a specific timing recheck. Completion criteria: The revised sound onset matches the required cue, and the record labels the later execution check as still needing observation.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.