Revise, verify attribution, and explain your changes
See this course’s project requirements
Submit a 450–650-word argument about a fictional training-center equipment-loan trial, with a source ledger and revision memo.
Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.
What to include
- Translate the assignment into a claim, audience, and evidence plan.
- Keep a three-source ledger distinguishing supplied facts, paraphrase, and your own reasoning.
- Integrate at least two sources in a reasoned argument with accurate attribution.
- Address one strong counterargument and acknowledge a material evidence limit.
- Revise the complete draft structurally and submit a memo documenting two substantive changes.
Review and revise
Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.
- Argument: a focused, defensible claim answers the assignment.
- Evidence: facts are accurate, attributed, and connected through reasoning.
- Complexity: the counterargument and limits are represented fairly.
- Revision: the final structure improves the argument and the memo explains meaningful changes.
Want more background?
The idea in everyday life
Revision ends when the argument meets its purpose and its claims match the evidence, not when every sentence sounds elaborate. You already have a focused plan for improvement. This final lesson applies those changes, checks attribution and numerical details, and documents why the essay improved. The memo makes your development visible without pretending the first draft was already complete.
A final draft should make its evidence and decisions traceable.
One step at a time.
Use the sample or information you have permission to use. Keep your work as you go. You can pause between steps.
- 1
Apply the two structural priorities from your revision plan. Revise the thesis, paragraph order, or analysis as needed, keeping a copy of the earlier draft for comparison.
- 2
Audit every numerical and factual statement against the source ledger. Preserve the distinction between volunteer reports, inventory counts, pending estimates, and your own proposed policies.
- 3
Check each paraphrase for accurate meaning, original wording and structure, and clear attribution. Confirm that all three fictional source entries appear in the reference list and that cited facts are easy to locate.
- 4
Read the essay for clarity, sentence errors, and missing transitions after the substantive changes. Verify the 450–650-word scope and all assignment requirements before marking it final.
- 5
Write an 80–120-word revision note. Explain two changes to the essay's ideas or structure, why you made them, and one limit in the evidence that remains. Collect the final essay, source ledger, and note as your completed project.
See how it works.
Fictional scenario: Jordan’s first draft claims the survey proves all learners need loans and recommends using every kit immediately. The final version limits the demand claim to volunteer respondents and proposes a capped trial subject to staffing approval. Jordan checks 18/30 = 60% and 180/15 = 12 estimated weekly loans against the ledger. The revision memo explains two substantive changes: narrowing the claim to match the sample and adding a reserve condition after considering the objection. A final proofreading pass fixes a missing source label and an ambiguous pronoun, but those edits are distinguished from the changes in reasoning.
Did you cover these?
- Two substantive changes are documented with reasons.
- All borrowed packet facts have clear source labels.
- The final claim preserves survey and staffing limitations.
What to finish
A final 450–650-word essay, source ledger, and 80–120-word revision memo.
Watch for this
Describing spelling corrections as the only evidence of substantive revision.
How can I tell I understand it?
The final argument answers the brief, uses evidence accurately, and explains how revision improved its reasoning.
Quick knowledge check
Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.
You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.
Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.
Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.
Go to the knowledge checkTools, templates, and lesson sources
Tools and templates
Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.
Sources and further reading
Explore the references behind this lesson.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-10
Opened the public handout to verify attribution and paraphrase guidance. Local citation and academic-integrity rules must still be checked for actual assignments.
Access: Free public reading; no account or purchase required.
Reuse: Linked for further study. Life Starter explanations, scenarios, and assessments are original; free access alone does not grant reuse rights.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-10
Opened the distinction between substantive revision and proofreading. UNC marks the handout CC BY-NC-ND; this curriculum links it and uses wholly original writing tasks.
Access: Free public reading; no account or purchase required.
Reuse: Linked for further study. Life Starter explanations, scenarios, and assessments are original; free access alone does not grant reuse rights.
Report a problem with this lesson
Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.