Build a source ledger and identify limits
See this course’s project requirements
Submit a 450–650-word argument about a fictional training-center equipment-loan trial, with a source ledger and revision memo.
Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.
What to include
- Translate the assignment into a claim, audience, and evidence plan.
- Keep a three-source ledger distinguishing supplied facts, paraphrase, and your own reasoning.
- Integrate at least two sources in a reasoned argument with accurate attribution.
- Address one strong counterargument and acknowledge a material evidence limit.
- Revise the complete draft structurally and submit a memo documenting two substantive changes.
Review and revise
Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.
- Argument: a focused, defensible claim answers the assignment.
- Evidence: facts are accurate, attributed, and connected through reasoning.
- Complexity: the counterargument and limits are represented fairly.
- Revision: the final structure improves the argument and the memo explains meaningful changes.
Want more background?
The idea in everyday life
A small packet can contain different kinds of evidence: survey responses, an inventory count, and a staff estimate. Each answers a different question and has its own limits. The goal is to understand those differences before combining the sources. Keep the source information stable so later revisions cannot accidentally turn an estimate into an observed result.
A source supports some claims better than others.
One step at a time.
Use the sample or information you have permission to use. Keep your work as you go. You can pause between steps.
- 1
Create a ledger with source label, type, exact fact, scope, and possible use in the argument. Enter all three supplied fictional sources without changing their status.
- 2
Calculate the percentage represented by 18 of 30 respondents and record the denominator. Explain why volunteer respondents may not represent every learner at the center.
- 3
Distinguish the inventory count in B from the time estimate in C. Mark the missing replacement reserve and unapproved staff allocation as separate feasibility questions.
- 4
Write one claim each source can support and one claim it cannot support. For example, available kits do not by themselves prove that home practice improves course completion.
- 5
Add a plain reference entry for each fictional source using its label, title, and week. Preserve this ledger as the fact-checking record for every later paragraph.
See how it works.
Fictional source packet: A, Learner Survey, week 1: 18 of 30 respondents reported no home practice kit; respondents volunteered after class. B, Inventory Record, week 1: 12 kits are available for a loan trial, with no replacement reserve included. C, Staff Planning Memo, week 1: each loan is estimated to require 15 minutes for checkout, return, and recordkeeping; 180 minutes weekly may be available, pending approval. Remy records 60% for A but labels it respondent data, not the whole center. C’s staffing is a tentative estimate, not confirmed capacity.
Did you cover these?
- Survey percentage is 60% of respondents.
- The 180-minute allocation is marked pending approval.
- Every source has a can-support and cannot-support claim.
What to finish
A three-source ledger with scope limits and a simple reference list.
Watch for this
Treating a planning estimate or volunteer survey as confirmed evidence about every learner.
How can I tell I understand it?
You accurately distinguish observed counts, respondent reports, and tentative estimates.
Quick knowledge check
Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.
You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.
Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.
Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.
Go to the knowledge checkTools, templates, and lesson sources
Tools and templates
Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.
Sources and further reading
Explore the references behind this lesson.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-10
Opened the handout and read distinctions between evidence types and analysis. No handout passages or exercises are copied.
Access: Free public reading; no account or purchase required.
Reuse: Linked for further study. Life Starter explanations, scenarios, and assessments are original; free access alone does not grant reuse rights.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-10
Opened the public handout to verify attribution and paraphrase guidance. Local citation and academic-integrity rules must still be checked for actual assignments.
Access: Free public reading; no account or purchase required.
Reuse: Linked for further study. Life Starter explanations, scenarios, and assessments are original; free access alone does not grant reuse rights.
Report a problem with this lesson
Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.