Review: Age guidance and evidence
Compare youth/adult guidance and fictional logs while preserving age and observation limits.
Bring the unit skills together
Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.
The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.
Use the skills in a new task
Compare a fictional 17 year-old with only a weekly average and a 20 year-old with 90 moderate+30 vigorous minutes, but no muscle-day record.
Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.
- Use the supplied facts without personal disclosures.
- Apply at least two methods from this unit.
- Show the sequence, calculation or evidence behind the decision.
- Include a relevant boundary, help step or accessible alternative.
Compare with a model response
Youth daily coverage is unknown from an average. The adult equivalence is 90+2*30=150 moderate-equivalent minutes, while clock time is 120 minutes. Muscle days and actual participation remain unknown. Keep ages explicit and allow paper-only completion.
A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.