The Life Starter
Sign up
Grade 9 · unit review

Review: Functional Design, Projection Models, and Process Evidence

Link a design’s purpose, representation and evidence. Prioritize required information, apply a stipulated projection model, construct an argument from visible features and organize a portfolio so a reviewer can trace revision decisions.

Download reviews and answer keys

Bring the unit skills together

Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.

Unit review questions
1. Original brief: help a reader recognize a bus-stop meeting point. Required information must remain visible, with decorative detail secondary. Which proposed hierarchy follows that purpose?
Need a hint?
  • A functional design brief begins with what the reader needs to do.
  • A stated hierarchy supports the defined information task but does not prove successful real use.
2. For a supplied perspective model, projected width is constantK divided by distance. At distance3, width is24 units. What width does the same model give at distance12?
Need a hint?
  • Under the supplied model, projected width equals a constant divided by distance.
  • This inverse-distance relationship is a simplified exercise model.
3. Original image evidence: three panels change from a closed to an open form. Which argument uses that feature without inventing intent or universal response?
Need a hint?
  • A visual argument explains how the arrangement of observed features supports a reading.
  • An interpretation may be well supported without being the only possible meaning.
4. An original process record dates rough thumbnail6, first draft8, criterion check14, revised draft16. A portfolio explanation focuses on revision criterion3. Which record order lets a reviewer trace that process?
Need a hint?
  • A process portfolio lets a reviewer follow a draft, its criterion check and the resulting revision.
  • A chronological record establishes sequence and documented decisions, not measured audience impact.

The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.

Use the skills in a new task

Complete this four-part arts evidence sheet. 1. Original brief: help a reader locate quiet study space. Required information must remain visible, with decorative detail secondary. Which proposed hierarchy follows that purpose? Supplied candidates: (A) Choose visual appeal only and ignore the stated reader task (B) Give the information needed to locate quiet study space primary space; keep decoration separate (C) Make decoration cover the required instruction (D) Remove all text labels and the key. Then Design a paper wayfinding panel that tells readers how to find a workshop room; separate required instructions from decoration. Criteria: The room identifier and route instruction remain visible and neither is replaced or obscured by decorative elements. 2. For a supplied perspective model, projected width is constantK divided by distance. At distance5, width is24 units. What width does the same model give at distance15? Supplied candidates: (A) 10 units (B) 7 units (C) 8 units (D) 9 units. Then Use width twenty-four at distance three to predict width at distance nine, showing the inferred constant. Criteria: The constant is seventy-two and the predicted width is eight units under the supplied model. 3. Original image evidence: two figures overlap while a third remains separate. Which argument uses that feature without inventing intent or universal response? Supplied candidates: (A) Every viewer must experience the same emotion (B) No interpretation can use visible features (C) The feature proves the maker’s entire biography (D) This arrangement may support a stated emphasis or relationship; explain how two figures overlap while a third remains separate serves that reading. Then Create an original abstract thumbnail and write an argument using two actual features and one qualified interpretation. Criteria: Each feature is visible, the reasoning explains its role and the interpretation is proportionate to the evidence. 4. An original process record dates rough thumbnail8, first draft10, criterion check18, revised draft20. A portfolio explanation focuses on revision criterion2. Which record order lets a reviewer trace that process? Supplied candidates: (A) criterion check → rough thumbnail → first draft → revised draft (B) revised draft → criterion check → first draft → rough thumbnail (C) rough thumbnail → first draft → criterion check → revised draft (D) rough thumbnail → revised draft → first draft → criterion check. Then Retain a thumbnail, draft, criterion note and revised draft in dated order with one before/after annotation. Criteria: The revision follows its check, and the annotation names a changed feature visible in both relevant artifacts.

Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.

  • Answer each supplied changed-input analysis with its visible evidence, rule or calculation.
  • Include the original artifact required for each lesson; paper/text equivalents are acceptable.
  • Apply the stated criteria and document one concrete revision.
  • Describe planning/analysis accurately; do not claim unobserved musical, acting or dance execution.
Compare with a model response

1. Give the information needed to locate quiet study space primary space; keep decoration separate. The required reader action depends on visible task information. Giving that information priority and preserving labels serves the specified function. Decoration can support the composition, but cannot replace or hide the information needed for locate quiet study space. An original artifact is acceptable when The room identifier and route instruction remain visible and neither is replaced or obscured by decorative elements. 2. 8 units. The first observation gives K=24×5=120. The farther width is K/15=8. This inverse-distance projection is a stipulated simplified model, not a measured rule for every artwork or real-world camera. An original artifact is acceptable when The constant is seventy-two and the predicted width is eight units under the supplied model. 3. This arrangement may support a stated emphasis or relationship; explain how two figures overlap while a third remains separate serves that reading. The overlap connects two figures in pictorial space, while the third remains apart. That arrangement supports a possible paired-versus-separate grouping reading; it does not prove friendship, conflict or the maker’s intention. An original artifact is acceptable when Each feature is visible, the reasoning explains its role and the interpretation is proportionate to the evidence. 4. rough thumbnail → first draft → criterion check → revised draft. The dates establish thumbnail before draft, check before revision. This order makes the observed change and its recorded reason traceable. It does not prove that the revision improved every audience outcome; the portfolio should include actual artifacts and the specific checked criterion. An original artifact is acceptable when The revision follows its check, and the annotation names a changed feature visible in both relevant artifacts.

A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.