Review, explain, practice

Study guide: Read perspectives and revise interpretations

Compare narrators, trace a theme across events, reconcile dated accounts, and revise an ambiguous explanation.

Download the grade study pack

Ideas to explain in your own words

Watch your reasoning

A worked review example

Notice what each narrator can know: Both accounts describe Jon passing the tables. Mara infers anger, while Jon reports a time-sensitive key return. The second account gives an alternative motive that the first account did not consider. Trace a Theme Through a Character’s Change: A possible theme is that sharing unfinished work can make learning visible. Inez initially hides her sketch, but she later seeks a suggestion and displays both the revised path and rough page. The contrast develops the idea across the story. Check Whether Accounts Really Conflict: The accounts are compatible: Monday had twelve drafts; removing three leaves nine, and adding five finished cards yields fourteen total on Wednesday. Only nine are drafts. The different totals describe a documented change, not necessarily a counting error. Make an Explanation’s Relationships Clear: Erin missed the meeting, so Luca sent her the notes. Before sending them, Luca organized the notes under headings, making them easier to follow. This names Erin and connects improved clarity to headings rather than to the missed meeting.

Make a practice plan

  1. Try the supplied lesson problems without looking at the answers.
  2. Compare your method with the worked examples and explain any correction.
  3. Use the new review cases, then complete the transfer task on paper or in your own document.