Grade 8 · unit review

Review: Prevention, pressure and injury help

Evaluate nicotine claims, pressure and injury responses without diagnosis or treatment.

Bring the unit skills together

Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.

Unit review questions
1. Evaluate a nicotine safety claim: A famous influencer calls a vape harmless with no evidence. What fits?
Need a hint?
  • Fewer harmful substances does not mean none or safe.
  • Do not taste, handle or test products to evaluate a health claim.
2. Use a bounded refusal and exit plan: A calm invitation conflicts with the character’s preference. What fits?
Need a hint?
  • A no does not require a health disclosure or successful debate.
  • A phrase cannot guarantee safety; blocked exits and threats need help.
3. Respond to a suspected concussion appropriately: A teammate offers to decide severity using a worksheet score. What fits?
Need a hint?
  • Only a healthcare provider assesses/clears suspected concussion; peers and timers cannot.
  • Feeling better does not authorize same-day return after suspected concussion.
4. Plan for heat without testing tolerance: Weakness is reported during a hot session. What fits?
Need a hint?
  • Do not test endurance in unsafe heat to complete a lesson.
  • Faintness or weakness in heat calls for stopping and prompt appropriate help.

The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.

Use the skills in a new task

A fictional event combines a nicotine advertisement, repeated pressure and a possible concussion after a hit. Write a bounded evidence and safety plan.

Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.

  • Use the supplied facts without personal disclosures.
  • Apply at least two methods from this unit.
  • Show the sequence, calculation or evidence behind the decision.
  • Include a relevant boundary, help step or accessible alternative.
Compare with a model response

Reject the ad’s fewer-means-safe logic. Use a clear refusal and a supervised exit for repeated pressure, with backup safety help. A suspected concussion requires immediate removal, no same-day return and healthcare assessment; peers cannot clear it. No exposure, confrontation or symptom test is required.

A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.