Review: Progression and safety models
Compare gradual paper-plan changes, recovery space and evidence limits.
Bring the unit skills together
Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.
The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.
Use the skills in a new task
A proposed paper duration changes 20 to 25 minutes, but the route is blocked and actual movement was not observed. Explain the change and release conditions for the model.
Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.
- Use the supplied facts without personal disclosures.
- Apply at least two methods from this unit.
- Show the sequence, calculation or evidence behind the decision.
- Include a relevant boundary, help step or accessible alternative.
Compare with a model response
The increase is 5 minutes and 5/20*100=25%, which does not certify safe progression. Redraw the blocked route and recheck the stated criteria. Keep physical performance unassessed, allow paper participation and use qualified support for any real injury or individualized plan.
A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.