Distinguish response strategies

Supplied materials

• Paper and pencil, or a browser text area. All named people/events/records are fictional learning inputs.
• Worked case: Excerpt A: Six volunteers replied during May; four requested larger labels. This sentence reports the supplied record. Excerpt B: The splendid new label makes our display magnificent. Analyze splendid. Excerpt C: Six volunteers replied; four favored larger type. Claim: Four of these six favored larger type. Excerpt D: Concern: text is small. Reply: In the recorded trial, three of four readers asked for help reading it.
• Primary check: Excerpt A: Please join a trial of larger labels next Friday. Excerpt B: Six people attended and submitted comments. Analyze attended. Excerpt C: Four of six volunteers favored larger labels. Claim: Everyone everywhere favors them. Excerpt D: Concern: the layout excludes some readers. Reply: You are foolish for complaining.

Learn the idea

A response can support a point, acknowledge uncertainty or revise a proposal. Dismissing the person avoids the issue and does not answer the evidence question.

Compare the concern with the response’s actual content. Identify whether it answers, qualifies, revises or attacks.

Original worked input: Original excerpt D: Concern: text is small. Reply: In the recorded trial, three of four readers asked for help reading it. The task is to distinguish response strategies. The answer is “gives relevant evidence”. Evidence: Concern: text is small. Reply: In the recorded trial, three of four readers asked for help reading it. Reasoning: gives relevant evidence is supported because a relevant trial observation answers the expressed concern. Respectful tone alone does not make a response relevant.

1. Read the supplied worked case and identify the part named in this lesson. An adult can model unfamiliar words.
2. Compare the concern with the response’s actual content. Identify whether it answers, qualifies, revises or attacks.
3. Check the worked solution: gives relevant evidence. Evidence: Concern: text is small. Reply: In the recorded trial, three of four readers asked for help reading it. Reasoning: gives relevant evidence is supported because a relevant trial observation answers the expressed concern. Respectful tone alone does not make a response relevant.
4. Use the new primary and practice cases. Give a reason from the actual words before checking the feedback.

Check your reasoning

Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.

Take it further

Changed-input task: Original excerpt D: Concern: no one can read the old type here. Reply: Two readers specifically reported that problem in this trial. Give an evidence-based answer before looking at the model. Expected reasoning: Evidence: Concern: no one can read the old type here. Reply: Two readers specifically reported that problem in this trial. Reasoning: gives relevant evidence is supported because a relevant trial observation answers the expressed concern. Respectful tone alone does not make a response relevant. Then write a brief alternative sentence, paragraph, source note or scene that demonstrates the same operation; label new fictional details and preserve source limits.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.