The Life Starter
Sign up
Grade 7 · unit review

Review: Dates, Copies, and Explanations

Use chronology and provenance to compare records and constrain causal claims.

Download reviews and answer keys

Bring the unit skills together

Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.

Unit review questions
1. Original fictional timeline: Jan 2 proposal for hall roof; Feb 1 timber invoice; Mar 7 diary “I sheltered under the new roof today.” What is supported?
2. New source chain: A diary says “lamp lit May 2”; B credits A; C uses only B and adds “first electric lamp in town.” What needs additional evidence?
3. A fictional May 3 invoice says chairs bought; a May 5 note says chairs delivered. Which reading is careful?
4. A club adds both evening hours and a new poster; monthly entries rise 50 to 70. Which result is established?

The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.

Use the skills in a new task

Original fictional archive: March 1 council plan proposes a reading room; March 20 receipt records shelves delivered; April 2 steward log “I unlocked the room at noon”; April 5 bulletin repeats the log and calls April 2 “the first-ever public opening.” Monthly entries rise 80 to 100 after April 2; extra opening hours also start then. Write a short exhibit note with a timeline, source-dependency check, and cautious causal explanation.

Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.

  • Order document dates and label plan, delivery, and observed action.
  • Identify the bulletin’s dependence and added wording.
  • Avoid treating unlock time as a proven first public opening.
  • Compute the entry increase.
  • Name the simultaneous hours change and a useful further record.
Compare with a model response

March 1 records a plan, March 20 a shelf delivery, and April 2 a steward’s reported unlocking at noon. The April 5 bulletin depends on that log and adds “first-ever public opening,” which the log does not establish. Entries rose by 20, but extra hours began at the same time, so the records cannot isolate an opening effect. A dated admission record could test first public use; comparable periods with unchanged hours could help investigate causes.

A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.