Choose a controlling statement

Supplied materials

• Paper and pencil, or a browser text area. All named people/events/records are fictional learning inputs.
• Worked case: Excerpt A: This report explains how a folded-paper hinge connects two panels. Excerpt B: Paragraphs: frame materials; hinge material and bend; support material and location. Excerpt C: Audience/task: submit the model’s trial report to the school panel. Excerpt D: Draft order: result, unexplained part list, assembly step, another part, prior question; readers cannot follow the sequence.
• Primary check: Excerpt A: The club should label model parts because visitors need to connect words to the drawing. Excerpt B: Paragraphs: reason one, identifying names; reason two, locating those named parts. Excerpt C: Audience/task: tell a close friend what happened at the display. Excerpt D: Draft: Add labels. Three readers asked about the hinge. It never explains why those questions support adding labels.

Learn the idea

An explanation’s controlling statement introduces what will be clarified; an argument’s position can be supported or challenged. A narrative goal drives events. An unrelated list lacks a shared focus.

Identify what the statement asks the rest of the text to develop. Plan only details that serve that job.

Original worked input: Original excerpt A: This report explains how a folded-paper hinge connects two panels. The task is to choose a controlling statement. The answer is “explanatory topic statement”. Evidence: This report explains how a folded-paper hinge connects two panels. Reasoning: explanatory topic statement is supported because it promises to clarify a mechanism rather than recommend a policy. A list of unrelated subjects is not a thesis.

1. Read the supplied worked case and identify the part named in this lesson. An adult can model unfamiliar words.
2. Identify what the statement asks the rest of the text to develop. Plan only details that serve that job.
3. Check the worked solution: explanatory topic statement. Evidence: This report explains how a folded-paper hinge connects two panels. Reasoning: explanatory topic statement is supported because it promises to clarify a mechanism rather than recommend a policy. A list of unrelated subjects is not a thesis.
4. Use the new primary and practice cases. Give a reason from the actual words before checking the feedback.

Check your reasoning

Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.

Take it further

Changed-input task: Original excerpt A: Jo must catch the bus before the workshop closes. Give an evidence-based answer before looking at the model. Expected reasoning: Evidence: Jo must catch the bus before the workshop closes. Reasoning: narrative goal is supported because it states the character’s desired outcome and deadline. A list of unrelated subjects is not a thesis. Then write a brief alternative sentence, paragraph, source note or scene that demonstrates the same operation; label new fictional details and preserve source limits.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.