Identify an argument appeal

Supplied materials

• Paper and pencil, or a browser text area. All named people/events/records are fictional learning inputs.
• Worked case: Excerpt A: Three of four trial visitors asked for part names. Labels can connect those names to the diagram, so test clearer labels. Excerpt B: Ignore Lea’s label proposal; her coat is ridiculous. Excerpt C: The log lists four returned forms. Excerpt D: Record A covers one month; B covers one year, both counting the same defined visitors.
• Primary check: Excerpt A: Trust my label proposal: I trained as a display designer for five years. No outcome data are supplied here. Excerpt B: We must choose red or blue labels. The supplied catalog also offers readable black labels. Excerpt C: Jo said nothing when the card arrived. The writer claims she intended to impress the visitors. Excerpt D: A counts all visitors; B counts only registered members, both during May.

Learn the idea

Arguments may appeal to reasoning, credibility or emotion. An appeal’s presence is a feature of persuasion, not proof that the position is correct.

Identify what the writer invites readers to trust: a logical relationship, credentials or feeling. Evaluate support separately.

Original worked input: Original excerpt A: Three of four trial visitors asked for part names. Labels can connect those names to the diagram, so test clearer labels. The task is to identify an argument appeal. The answer is “reasoning with evidence”. Evidence: Three of four trial visitors asked for part names. Labels can connect those names to the diagram, so test clearer labels. Reasoning: reasoning with evidence is supported because a relevant observed count is connected to the proposed action by a reason. Emotion can motivate without establishing a factual result.

1. Read the supplied worked case and identify the part named in this lesson. An adult can model unfamiliar words.
2. Identify what the writer invites readers to trust: a logical relationship, credentials or feeling. Evaluate support separately.
3. Check the worked solution: reasoning with evidence. Evidence: Three of four trial visitors asked for part names. Labels can connect those names to the diagram, so test clearer labels. Reasoning: reasoning with evidence is supported because a relevant observed count is connected to the proposed action by a reason. Emotion can motivate without establishing a factual result.
4. Use the new primary and practice cases. Give a reason from the actual words before checking the feedback.

Check your reasoning

Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.

Take it further

Changed-input task: Original excerpt A: Picture someone waiting anxiously outside because the small sign cannot be read. Give an evidence-based answer before looking at the model. Expected reasoning: Evidence: Picture someone waiting anxiously outside because the small sign cannot be read. Reasoning: emotion is supported because the image invites readers to feel a person’s exclusion or anxiety. Emotion can motivate without establishing a factual result. Then write a brief alternative sentence, paragraph, source note or scene that demonstrates the same operation; label new fictional details and preserve source limits.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.