Distinguish reported fact and interpretation

Supplied materials

• Paper and pencil, or a browser text area. All named people/events/records are fictional learning inputs.
• Worked case: Excerpt A: Three of four trial visitors asked for part names. Labels can connect those names to the diagram, so test clearer labels. Excerpt B: Ignore Lea’s label proposal; her coat is ridiculous. Excerpt C: The log lists four returned forms. Excerpt D: Record A covers one month; B covers one year, both counting the same defined visitors.
• Primary check: Excerpt A: Trust my label proposal: I trained as a display designer for five years. No outcome data are supplied here. Excerpt B: We must choose red or blue labels. The supplied catalog also offers readable black labels. Excerpt C: Jo said nothing when the card arrived. The writer claims she intended to impress the visitors. Excerpt D: A counts all visitors; B counts only registered members, both during May.

Learn the idea

Counts report measurements; motive interpretations infer intentions; recommendations propose action; definitions explain terms. A text can contain all four while giving them different levels of support.

Read the actual sentence and classify its function. State what further evidence would be needed for an inferred motive.

Original worked input: Original excerpt C: The log lists four returned forms. The task is to distinguish reported fact and interpretation. The answer is “observed count”. Evidence: The log lists four returned forms. Reasoning: observed count is supported because a log or count describes an observed quantity. A should sentence is a recommendation.

1. Read the supplied worked case and identify the part named in this lesson. An adult can model unfamiliar words.
2. Read the actual sentence and classify its function. State what further evidence would be needed for an inferred motive.
3. Check the worked solution: observed count. Evidence: The log lists four returned forms. Reasoning: observed count is supported because a log or count describes an observed quantity. A should sentence is a recommendation.
4. Use the new primary and practice cases. Give a reason from the actual words before checking the feedback.

Check your reasoning

Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.

Take it further

Changed-input task: Original excerpt C: A response is one submitted reply under this log’s definition. Give an evidence-based answer before looking at the model. Expected reasoning: Evidence: A response is one submitted reply under this log’s definition. Reasoning: definition is supported because the sentence supplies what the named term means. A should sentence is a recommendation. Then write a brief alternative sentence, paragraph, source note or scene that demonstrates the same operation; label new fictional details and preserve source limits.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.