Grade 6 · unit review

Review: A Small Research Process and Clear Presentation

Apply set a research question’s scope, sort a source note’s status, identify citation information, choose an oral explanation aid using supplied texts and original responses.

Bring the unit skills together

Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.

Unit review questions
1. Original excerpt A: The only available card gives a five-bend trial, with no interview or private thoughts. Question: What secret fear led the builder to stop? Use excerpt A only. Which description best identifies the actual scope and available evidence for this question?
Need a hint?
  • Name what the sources actually contain.
  • A compelling question can still exceed the available evidence.
2. Original excerpt B: Source: One trial ended after five bends. Note: The record describes one trial ending at five bends. Use excerpt B only. What kind of note is supplied?
Need a hint?
  • New wording still needs attribution.
  • A locator is not itself a factual finding.
3. Original excerpt C: Citation: Model Club, Trial Card A, 2026, p. 2. Analyze p. 2. Use excerpt C only. Which citation component is named?
Need a hint?
  • Section 2 is a locator.
  • An access date is not always the publication date.
4. Original excerpt D: Assembly happened Monday, testing Tuesday and display Friday; the audience needs that sequence. Use excerpt D only. Which presentation aid fits the stated task?
Need a hint?
  • Say what the axes or labels mean.
  • A source list does not replace explaining the findings.

The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.

Use the skills in a new task

Make a short complete response demonstrating the four skills in this unit. Use this supplied fictional source: Model Club, Paper Model Notes, 2026, section 2: The frame is cardboard; the hinge is paper. Ask a focused parts/materials question, make a quoted note and a paraphrase with attribution, prepare a comparison table and give a brief explanation. Do not invent the builder’s motives. Longer writing targets in optional extensions can be completed in a later session.

Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.

  • Name what the question requests, identify the available evidence, and distinguish a multi-detail inquiry, a single lookup, an unbounded topic, and an absent private-motive record.
  • Use the explicit source-note label and compare wording when available. Keep quotation marks and source details attached to borrowed material.
  • Identify the supplied detail’s role. Keep missing details honest instead of inventing a date or author.
  • Match the listening need to the aid and prepare one sentence explaining how to read it.
Compare with a model response

Question: Which materials form this model's frame and hinge? Quotation: Model Club states, "The frame is cardboard; the hinge is paper" (Paper Model Notes, 2026, section 2). Paraphrase: In that record the club identifies cardboard as the frame material and paper as the connection material. Comparison table: Part | Material Frame | Cardboard Hinge | Paper Talk outline: identify the two parts, read the two material rows, then give the source and section. This source answers the material question but does not establish the builder's motives or later durability.

A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.