Grade 5 · unit review

Review: Structure an Accessible Paper Web Page

Draw a paper practice page with a heading, three-item list, a resource link and a Check answer button. Supply text for its meaningful route image and describe a keyboard test.

Bring the unit skills together

Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.

Unit review questions
1. Set spacing between sections. Classify the requested layer.
Need a hint?
  • Identify whether the requested change concerns meaning, visual presentation or an interactive response.
  • Making text large does not itself give the text heading semantics.
2. Open an identified outside resource. Which element purpose fits?
Need a hint?
  • Choose the element whose stated purpose matches the content or action.
  • A link and a button can look alike but serve different purposes.
3. Bar picture carries category-count differences. Which alternative matches the stated content?
Need a hint?
  • Describe the information the meaningful image contributes to this task.
  • A filename or the words picture here do not explain a diagram’s content.
4. Tab position is visually invisible. Which improvement addresses the stated barrier?
Need a hint?
  • Offer an operable control and a visible focus path for the same task.
  • A keyboard shortcut is not enough if the learner cannot discover or complete the task.

The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.

Use the skills in a new task

Draw a paper practice page with a heading, three-item list, a resource link and a Check answer button. Supply text for its meaningful route image and describe a keyboard test.

Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.

  • Use the pretend details in the task and name the rule you followed.
  • Show the steps or point to the detail that helped you choose.
  • Say one mistake to avoid or one thing this example cannot tell us.
  • Check your answer against the task. Change a part if you can show why it needs fixing.
Compare with a model response

I use heading/list structure, a navigation link and an action button. The route alternative states A→B→C. The test checks reaching and activating each control with visible focus; a paper plan alone does not prove real-page accessibility.

A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.