Review: Headings, Graphics and Explanatory Organization
Apply choose an explanatory structure, read a graphic’s purpose, recognize a heading level, keep an explanatory tone using supplied texts and original responses.
Bring the unit skills together
Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.
The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.
Use the skills in a new task
Make a short complete response demonstrating the four skills in this unit. Write a short explanation of a fictional paper bridge with sections Materials and Testing. Supplied record: paper, two books, three toy blocks held before bending. Add a labeled diagram and a caption. Report the observed test without calling the design perfect. Longer writing targets in optional extensions can be completed in a later session.
Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.
- Read the stated plan and name how its ideas are connected. Sketch that arrangement before drafting a paragraph.
- Identify the stated graphic format and the question it answers. Read labels and any units before interpreting details.
- Use the supplied nesting description, not font size imagined from an unavailable page. Place the heading at the described level.
- Distinguish the supplied factual reporting word from value judgments. Write an explanation that reports what was done.
Compare with a model response
Title: Paper Bridge Model. Materials: one paper sheet and two books. Testing: the folded sheet bridged the books and held three toy blocks before bending in this fictional test. Diagram labels show the sheet, books and blocks. Caption: Three blocks rest on the bridge. I report held three blocks rather than perfect, because one observation does not establish overall quality or unlimited strength.
A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.