Grade 12 · unit review

Review: Reproduce Analyses and Evaluate Responsible AI

Audit draft: "12 people completed; the tool caused 80%success; it won a prize." Evidence contains 12 completed attempts of 15 and nothing else. Rewrite it and state a review route.

Bring the unit skills together

Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.

Unit review questions
1. Different script release label. Which reproducibility input is described?
Need a hint?
  • Record data,code,configuration and relevant environment together before comparing outputs.
  • A screenshot of a result does not preserve the method that produced it.
2. Checked identical deterministic setup yields unequal totals. Which comparison situation is stated?
Need a hint?
  • Compare the stated inputs and conditions before interpreting different outputs.
  • Matching one number does not establish every output or real-world claim.
3. 80%ofallpeople succeeded. Evidence:12 of 15 fictional attempts complete; no people count,no comparison group,no citation for prize. Classify the claim.
Need a hint?
  • Match each claim to its supporting evidence and preserve scope and uncertainty.
  • Fluent wording is not proof that a reference exists or supports the claim.
4. Criteria and input evidence are documented. Which documented policy part is described?
Need a hint?
  • Specify reviewer,evidence and revision route instead of using human-reviewed as an unsupported label.
  • A human merely seeing an output does not prove a meaningful review occurred.

The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.

Use the skills in a new task

Audit draft: "12 people completed; the tool caused 80%success; it won a prize." Evidence contains 12 completed attempts of 15 and nothing else. Rewrite it and state a review route.

Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.

  • Use only supplied fictional inputs and state the relevant rule.
  • Include labeled steps or evidence for each decision.
  • Name one limitation or tempting mistake.
  • Check that the result meets the task and revise a justified error.
Compare with a model response

The supplied fictional log contains 12 completed attempts out of 15, an 80%attempt rate. It does not establish people counts,causation or a prize. A named reviewer checks claims against records, and a documented correction route lets errors be challenged.

A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.