16 questions · explained feedback · no signup

Grade 12: Social studies subject test

Try the supplied cases without hints first. Use paper for calculations, notes or drawings. Check all your answers together, then revisit the lessons you want to practice.

Take breaks when useful. Leaving or reloading clears these answers; download your notes before leaving. This practice test is not a standardized examination, school grade or credential.

Download tests & answer keys

Subject practice test

Choose an answer for each problem. Explain your method on paper, then use the feedback to decide what to revisit.

1. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional legislators question ministers about decisions. / Fictional government must retain legislative confidence. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?Both establish only a process for questioning or reviewing executive decisions.Both establish only this feature: “the executive depends on support within the legislature”.The first concerns a process for questioning or reviewing executive decisions; the second concerns this feature: “the executive depends on support within the legislature”. They are distinct features.The first concerns this feature: “the executive depends on support within the legislature”; the second concerns a process for questioning or reviewing executive decisions.

2. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional local office implements a nationally defined service. / Fictional framework gives the national authority the principal constitutional power. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?Both establish only ultimate constitutional authority centered nationally in the stated model.The first concerns carrying out assigned tasks within a local area; the second concerns ultimate constitutional authority centered nationally in the stated model. They are distinct features.The first concerns ultimate constitutional authority centered nationally in the stated model; the second concerns carrying out assigned tasks within a local area.Both establish only carrying out assigned tasks within a local area.

3. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional parties agree on joint government after seat allocation. / Fictional 60% vote share receives 60% of seats in an exact-allocation example. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?Both establish only negotiation among selected parties to assemble governing support.Both establish only this feature: “seats are allocated according to vote shares under the stated model”.The first concerns negotiation among selected parties to assemble governing support; the second concerns this feature: “seats are allocated according to vote shares under the stated model”. They are distinct features.The first concerns this feature: “seats are allocated according to vote shares under the stated model”; the second concerns negotiation among selected parties to assemble governing support.

4. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional institution publishes its decision records. / Fictional agency publishes reasons and permits review. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?Both establish only availability of relevant information about public action.Both establish only implementers explaining actions and facing review.The first concerns availability of relevant information about public action; the second concerns implementers explaining actions and facing review. They are distinct features.The first concerns implementers explaining actions and facing review; the second concerns availability of relevant information about public action.

5. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional chain documents where inputs originate. / Fictional chain has two usable suppliers for one input. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?The first concerns an available alternative route or source; the second concerns visibility of relevant production and movement information.Both establish only visibility of relevant production and movement information.Both establish only an available alternative route or source.The first concerns visibility of relevant production and movement information; the second concerns an available alternative route or source. They are distinct features.

6. Fictional value $120, tariff 25%, no other fees. Landed cost?$150$30$120$90

7. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional output rises but household income data are missing. / Fictional one group gains while another loses. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?The first concerns a relevant feature not established by the supplied evidence; the second concerns this feature: “how gains or costs are divided among participants”. They are distinct features.The first concerns this feature: “how gains or costs are divided among participants”; the second concerns a relevant feature not established by the supplied evidence.Both establish only a relevant feature not established by the supplied evidence.Both establish only this feature: “how gains or costs are divided among participants”.

8. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional program defines which applicants may participate. / A fictional employer recruits workers arriving from another region. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?Both establish only a stated formal condition governing access in this exercise.Both establish only a relationship involving work across migration contexts.The first concerns a stated formal condition governing access in this exercise; the second concerns a relationship involving work across migration contexts. They are distinct features.The first concerns a relationship involving work across migration contexts; the second concerns a stated formal condition governing access in this exercise.

9. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional community has maintained warning and support systems. / Fictional homes are located in the mapped flood zone. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?The first concerns resources or capabilities supporting response and resilience; the second concerns people or assets located where the hazard could affect them. They are distinct features.The first concerns people or assets located where the hazard could affect them; the second concerns resources or capabilities supporting response and resilience.Both establish only resources or capabilities supporting response and resilience.Both establish only people or assets located where the hazard could affect them.

10. Fictional community uses 7500 liters daily for 100 people. Daily use per person?75 liters per person per day100 liters per person per day7500 liters per person per day750 liters per person per day

11. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional plan places buildings inside a flood zone. / Fictional plan preserves wetland water storage. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?The first concerns the presence of people or assets within a hazard area; the second concerns a landscape’s role supporting stated natural processes. They are distinct features.The first concerns a landscape’s role supporting stated natural processes; the second concerns the presence of people or assets within a hazard area.Both establish only the presence of people or assets within a hazard area.Both establish only a landscape’s role supporting stated natural processes.

12. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional study measures outcomes after a transport policy. / Fictional report totals emissions from listed transport sources. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?The first concerns assessment of actual results and trade-offs after an intervention; the second concerns an accounting of specified emission sources within a boundary. They are distinct features.The first concerns an accounting of specified emission sources within a boundary; the second concerns assessment of actual results and trade-offs after an intervention.Both establish only assessment of actual results and trade-offs after an intervention.Both establish only an accounting of specified emission sources within a boundary.

13. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional question asks how an application is reviewed. / Fictional question asks how many residents used the stated service last month. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?Both establish only a question about measured or documented conditions.The first concerns a question about how a stated process operates; the second concerns a question about measured or documented conditions. They are distinct features.The first concerns a question about measured or documented conditions; the second concerns a question about how a stated process operates.Both establish only a question about how a stated process operates.

14. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional archive lacks records from one year. / Fictional analysis checks a meeting record against an independent attendance log. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?The first concerns comparison with relevant independent evidence; the second concerns information absent from the supplied record.Both establish only information absent from the supplied record.Both establish only comparison with relevant independent evidence.The first concerns information absent from the supplied record; the second concerns comparison with relevant independent evidence. They are distinct features.

15. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional proposal lacks data about sustained use. / Fictional plan predicts shorter waiting times. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?Both establish only a relevant conclusion not established by the evidence.Both establish only a projected favorable effect not yet observed.The first concerns a relevant conclusion not established by the evidence; the second concerns a projected favorable effect not yet observed. They are distinct features.The first concerns a projected favorable effect not yet observed; the second concerns a relevant conclusion not established by the evidence.

16. Original classroom brief combines two notes: Fictional brief would revise if costs exceed the stated cap. / Fictional brief says the model does not measure actual ridership. Its draft wrongly treats them as identical. Which corrected comparison is supported?The first concerns a relevant boundary on what the finding establishes; the second concerns a condition stating what evidence would change the recommendation.Both establish only a condition stating what evidence would change the recommendation.Both establish only a relevant boundary on what the finding establishes.The first concerns a condition stating what evidence would change the recommendation; the second concerns a relevant boundary on what the finding establishes. They are distinct features.

Your choices are temporary. Feedback appears after you check all the answers.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. Keep your own notes or download them before leaving. The score describes these questions; it does not certify subject mastery.