Remove Reversed Duplicate Committee Selections
An unordered two-person committee does not distinguish first and second selection.
About 25 minutes, plus any extended practice
Supplied materials
- Paper or a browser scratch area; a calculator is optional unless rounding is requested.
- Supplied teaching case: From 5 distinct candidates choose an unordered two-person committee. How many committees are possible? Candidate answers: (A) 10 (B) 11 (C) 20 (D) 9.
- Independent check inputs: From 6 distinct candidates choose an unordered two-person committee. How many committees are possible? Candidate answers: (A) 14 (B) 15 (C) 16 (D) 30.
Learn the idea
Counting methods distinguish ordered roles from unordered groups. A probability model assigns chances to possible outcomes, and expected value or binomial counting combines those probabilities while preserving what a single trial can actually produce. An unordered two-person committee does not distinguish first and second selection. Ordered counting includes each pair twice, so dividing by two recovers the distinct committees.
Here is the method on the supplied teaching case. Ordered selections total 5(4), but each pair is counted twice in reverse order. Divide by 2: 10 committees.
Only divide by the number of equivalent orderings appropriate to the stated group size. Different named roles would make reversed choices genuinely different; a committee without roles is the unordered case here.
- Write or sketch the supplied teaching case, labeling its quantities and restrictions.
- Apply the method shown in the worked solution, keeping each intermediate equality or justified inference.
- Solve the independent check with its changed inputs before revealing feedback.
- Complete the three practice cases; explain which mathematical rule rules out one distractor in each case.
See the method in action
Teaching case: From 5 distinct candidates choose an unordered two-person committee. How many committees are possible? Candidate answers: (A) 10 (B) 11 (C) 20 (D) 9. Solution: Ordered selections total 5(4), but each pair is counted twice in reverse order. Divide by 2: 10 committees. The final answer is 10. Only divide by the number of equivalent orderings appropriate to the stated group size. Different named roles would make reversed choices genuinely different; a committee without roles is the unordered case here.
Check your reasoning
Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.
Helpful tips
- An unordered two-person committee does not distinguish first and second selection.
- Only divide by the number of equivalent orderings appropriate to the stated group size.
See the answer and explanation
15
Ordered selections total 6(5), but each pair is counted twice in reverse order. Divide by 2: 15 committees.
Take it further
Changed-input task: From 12 distinct candidates choose an unordered two-person committee. How many committees are possible? Candidate answers: (A) 132 (B) 65 (C) 66 (D) 67. Show the mathematical reason, not only the selected answer. Expected result: 66. Ordered selections total 12(11), but each pair is counted twice in reverse order. Divide by 2: 66 committees.
Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.
More practice: try new cases
Choose an answer for each problem. Explain your method on paper, then use the feedback to decide what to revisit.
Your choices are temporary. Feedback appears after you check all the answers.
Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. Keep your own notes or download them before leaving. The score describes these questions; it does not certify subject mastery.
Check the subject sources
These LifeStarter passages, scenarios and exercises are authored for this Academy with AI assistance and review. External resources keep their publishers’ terms. A grade label suggests a starting level; it does not establish alignment with your school’s complete requirements.