Grade 11 · lesson 4 of 4

Compare week plans using multiple criteria

Compare week plans using multiple criteria

About 18 minutes, plus any extended practice

Download the grade pack

Supplied materials

  • Paper or a text document; all cases below are original fictional learning inputs.
  • An adult may read aloud; drawing or spoken answers are valid. No personal health information or physical performance is required.
  • PlanA has a sixty-minute weekly average but lower weekday totals. PlanB supplies sixty minutes each day, but has no access or safety details. A can be flagged for a daily-pattern planning gap; B’s daily-time component is supported in the model while its missing checks remain unknown. The comparison should not declare B universally safe or treat A’s average as proof of daily coverage.
  • A teen week averages 60 but four days are below 60. What fits?
  • Each fictional day is 60, but access/environment information is absent. What fits?
  • One 15 minute dual-type block is recorded as 30 clock minutes. What fits?
  • A plan gives times but no participant abilities or environment conditions. What fits?
  • A high Sunday total hides five lower weekdays. What fits?
  • All time totals are correct but no safety/access evidence exists. What fits?

Learn the idea

A week plan needs more than one number. For a teen, daily totals, type-day counts, access, environment and individual support can matter. A higher weekly sum does not automatically make a plan better, safer or appropriate for every person.

Create a comparison table with one column per stated criterion. Do not let an average erase daily gaps or an overlapping type create extra minutes. Select a revision supported by the actual evidence, and leave missing conditions unknown.

Use fictional plans only. No activity or personal data is required. Paper participation is complete. Real-world suitability and performance need appropriate observation and guidance; a plan comparison cannot certify health or motor outcomes.

  1. Mark the facts or constraints in the supplied case.
  2. Apply the method explained above; draw a sequence, table or decision map.
  3. Compare your result with the worked solution and explain the difference.
  4. Complete the new cases, then check the changed-case extension.
Worked example

See the method in action

PlanA has a sixty-minute weekly average but lower weekday totals. PlanB supplies sixty minutes each day, but has no access or safety details. A can be flagged for a daily-pattern planning gap; B’s daily-time component is supported in the model while its missing checks remain unknown. The comparison should not declare B universally safe or treat A’s average as proof of daily coverage.

Your turn

Check your reasoning

Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.

Helpful tips
  • A sum or average cannot stand in for all planning checks.
  • Absent access or safety information must not be marked passed.
Compare week plans using multiple criteria: A teen week averages 60 but four days are below 60. What fits?

Feedback appears here after you check. This is practice, not a graded school assessment.

See the answer and explanation

Flag the daily-pattern gap because a weekly average conceals lower youth days.

The daily pattern differs from the youth reference despite the average.

Take it further

Compare a teen 60 average week with varying days against a 60-each-day plan lacking access facts. Expected: daily gap in the first, time support in second, unknown access/suitability and no universal safety claim.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.

More practice: try new cases

Choose an answer for each problem. Explain your method on paper, then use the feedback to decide what to revisit.

More practice: try new cases
1. Compare week plans using multiple criteria: Each fictional day is 60, but access/environment information is absent. What fits?
Need a hint?
  • A sum or average cannot stand in for all planning checks.
  • Absent access or safety information must not be marked passed.
2. Compare week plans using multiple criteria: One 15 minute dual-type block is recorded as 30 clock minutes. What fits?
Need a hint?
  • A sum or average cannot stand in for all planning checks.
  • Absent access or safety information must not be marked passed.
3. Compare week plans using multiple criteria: A plan gives times but no participant abilities or environment conditions. What fits?
Need a hint?
  • A sum or average cannot stand in for all planning checks.
  • Absent access or safety information must not be marked passed.

Your choices are temporary. Feedback appears after you check all the answers.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. Keep your own notes or download them before leaving. The score describes these questions; it does not certify subject mastery.

Check the subject sources

These LifeStarter passages, scenarios and exercises are authored for this Academy with AI assistance and review. External resources keep their publishers’ terms. A grade label suggests a starting level; it does not establish alignment with your school’s complete requirements.