Apply an Explicit Display Order
An exhibition sequence can follow a declared organizing relation such as rough-to-refined process or sparse-to-dense marking.
About 25 minutes, plus any extended practice
Supplied materials
- Paper and a pencil, typed notes or a browser scratch area. Color names can replace colored supplies; drawn figures and timelines can replace performance.
- Complete teaching inputs: Original exhibit records give works A–D these sparse-to-dense ranks: {'A': 3, 'B': 1, 'C': 4, 'D': 2}. Which display sequence follows ascending rank? Supplied candidates: (A) A → B → C → D (B) B → D → A → C (C) C → A → D → B (D) D → C → B → A.
- Independent check: Original exhibit records give works A–D these sparse-to-dense ranks: {'A': 2, 'B': 4, 'C': 1, 'D': 3}. Which display sequence follows ascending rank? Supplied candidates: (A) A → B → C → D (B) B → D → A → C (C) C → A → D → B (D) D → C → B → A.
Learn the idea
Build a curatorial argument from documented features. Select comparable original works, declare an ordering criterion, acknowledge conflicting visual evidence and connect each revision claim with the artifacts and checks that actually support it. An exhibition sequence can follow a declared organizing relation such as rough-to-refined process or sparse-to-dense marking. Use the records’ ranked evidence rather than silently switching criteria.
Reason through the supplied case: Sort by the supplied ranks: B has rank 1, D has rank 2, A has rank 3, C has rank 4. Thus B → D → A → C follows the declared sparse-to-dense order. Another criterion could justify another display, but it would need to be stated rather than silently substituted.
Another sequence can be defensible under another stated brief. The task’s objective question concerns whether a candidate follows the supplied ordering criterion, not the only good way to curate.
- Read the complete teaching inputs and mark the feature, rule or constraint being tested.
- Compare the model decision with one rejected candidate; state the visible evidence or calculation that distinguishes them.
- Solve the independent check and the three changed-input practice cases before reading feedback.
- Make four labeled process stages ranked rough-to-refined and arrange a paper display in that declared order.
- Check your artifact against these explicit criteria: The sequence follows all four ranks, and the label explains the organizing relation.
See the method in action
Original exhibit records give works A–D these sparse-to-dense ranks: {'A': 3, 'B': 1, 'C': 4, 'D': 2}. Which display sequence follows ascending rank? Supplied candidates: (A) A → B → C → D (B) B → D → A → C (C) C → A → D → B (D) D → C → B → A. Model decision: B → D → A → C. Sort by the supplied ranks: B has rank 1, D has rank 2, A has rank 3, C has rank 4. Thus B → D → A → C follows the declared sparse-to-dense order. Another criterion could justify another display, but it would need to be stated rather than silently substituted.
Check your reasoning
Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.
Helpful tips
- An exhibition sequence can follow a declared organizing relation such as rough-to-refined process or sparse-to-dense marking.
- Another sequence can be defensible under another stated brief.
See the answer and explanation
C → A → D → B
Sort by the supplied ranks: C has rank 1, A has rank 2, D has rank 3, B has rank 4. Thus C → A → D → B follows the declared sparse-to-dense order. Another criterion could justify another display, but it would need to be stated rather than silently substituted.
Take it further
New-input analysis: Original exhibit records give works A–D these sparse-to-dense ranks: {'A': 1, 'B': 4, 'C': 3, 'D': 2}. Which display sequence follows ascending rank? Supplied candidates: (A) A → B → C → D (B) A → D → C → B (C) B → C → D → A (D) D → C → B → A. Expected relationship: A → D → C → B. Sort by the supplied ranks: A has rank 1, D has rank 2, C has rank 3, B has rank 4. Thus A → D → C → B follows the declared sparse-to-dense order. Another criterion could justify another display, but it would need to be stated rather than silently substituted. Create your own artifact: Make four labeled process stages ranked rough-to-refined and arrange a paper display in that declared order. Completion criteria: The sequence follows all four ranks, and the label explains the organizing relation.
Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.
More practice: try new cases
Choose an answer for each problem. Explain your method on paper, then use the feedback to decide what to revisit.
Your choices are temporary. Feedback appears after you check all the answers.
Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. Keep your own notes or download them before leaving. The score describes these questions; it does not certify subject mastery.
Check the subject sources
- Getty Museum: Understanding Formal Analysis
- Getty Museum: Principles of Design
- Metropolitan Museum of Art: Every Picture Tells a Story
- National Core Arts Standards: framework and artistic processes
These LifeStarter passages, scenarios and exercises are authored for this Academy with AI assistance and review. External resources keep their publishers’ terms. A grade label suggests a starting level; it does not establish alignment with your school’s complete requirements.