Review: Assess Data-Driven Decisions and Tradeoffs
A model has 3 false positives and 2 false negatives under 2/5 point weights. It detects 6 of 8 positives and receives a 0.6 score under the supplied action policy. Calculate and explain the bounded decision.
Bring the unit skills together
Use these 4 new cases to check your reasoning. Choices are temporary and are not saved to an account, sent to staff or recorded as school grades. Download your current review choices before leaving or reloading.
The download contains your current choices and any checked feedback. Keep the separate transfer-task work in your own document; downloading its instructions does not mark it complete.
Use the skills in a new task
A model has 3 false positives and 2 false negatives under 2/5 point weights. It detects 6 of 8 positives and receives a 0.6 score under the supplied action policy. Calculate and explain the bounded decision.
Work on paper or in your own document. Explain the choices you made.
- Use only supplied fictional inputs and state the relevant rule.
- Include labeled steps or evidence for each decision.
- Name one limitation or tempting mistake.
- Check that the result meets the task and revise a justified error.
Compare with a model response
Modeled error cost is 3×2+2×5=16 points. Recall is 6/8=75%. Score 0.6 triggers holding for more evidence, not automatic action. These calculations do not establish universal fairness or a guaranteed individual outcome.
A different response can also meet the criteria. Compare the evidence and reasoning, rather than copying the wording.