Separate evolutionary mechanisms
Separate evolutionary mechanisms using supplied evidence and a solved model.
About 25 minutes, plus any extended practice
Supplied materials
- All measurements and observations below are supplied classroom examples. They are not data from actual learners or a claim about a particular real site.
- Paper or a browser document for a labeled drawing, table or explanation.
- Worked problem inputs: A small population’s frequencies shift after a random survivor sample, with no measured trait advantage. Compare drift and selection.
- Assessment case 1: An inherited variant produces more offspring under one condition and rises over generations. What supports selection over drift alone? Which inference or prediction is best supported?
- Assessment case 2: Which scientific label fits the specifically described step or feature? Supplied case: Chance sampling alters a small population.
- Assessment case 3: Which scientific label fits the specifically described step or feature? Supplied case: Migrants bring a variant into population.
- Assessment case 4: Which scientific label fits the specifically described step or feature? Supplied case: A new DNA sequence change appears.
- Assessment case 5: Which scientific label fits the specifically described step or feature? Supplied case: Random founder sample changes frequencies.
- Assessment case 6: Migrants enter a population, breed and contribute alleles. What population pathway is established? Which inference or prediction is best supported?
Learn the idea
Population frequencies can change by selection, random drift, gene flow or new mutation. Distinguishing mechanisms requires evidence. A change that looks useful is not proof it arose because it was needed.
Selection means trait-linked reproductive differences change frequencies. Drift means random sampling changes frequencies. Gene flow means migration transfers genetic variants. Mutation means new sequence variation arises.
For the supplied mechanism problem, A small population’s frequencies shift after a random survivor sample, with no measured trait advantage. Compare drift and selection. Random sampling fits drift. Selection would require evidence connecting inherited traits to reproductive differences. A frequency shift alone cannot establish that advantage.
- Read the supplied problem and mark the structures, processes or quantities named: A small population’s frequencies shift after a random survivor sample, with no measured trait advantage. Compare drift and selection.
- Draw the relevant boundary, pathway or comparison and label it using the scientific ideas above.
- Write a causal explanation or calculation, showing how each observation supports the result.
- Compare your reasoning with the worked solution; name a condition that would change or limit the inference.
See the method in action
Worked supplied problem: A small population’s frequencies shift after a random survivor sample, with no measured trait advantage. Compare drift and selection. Solution: Random sampling fits drift. Selection would require evidence connecting inherited traits to reproductive differences. A frequency shift alone cannot establish that advantage. This conclusion uses the stated observations and the mechanism explained above; it does not establish every unmeasured feature of a real organism, device or place.
Check your reasoning
Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.
Helpful tips
- Use the feature “trait-linked reproductive differences change frequencies” to justify selection; do not sort by the name alone.
- Distinguish drift (random sampling changes frequencies) from a different process occurring in the same situation.
See the answer and explanation
The supplied heritable reproductive difference links variant and frequency change.
Differential reproduction tied to heritable variation supports selection in the stated condition.
Take it further
New case: migrants introduce an allele absent from local records. Expected: gene flow is a candidate mechanism; do not call migration evidence proof of local selection advantage.
Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.
More practice: try new cases
Choose an answer for each problem. Explain your method on paper, then use the feedback to decide what to revisit.
Your choices are temporary. Feedback appears after you check all the answers.
Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. Keep your own notes or download them before leaving. The score describes these questions; it does not certify subject mastery.
Check the subject sources
These LifeStarter passages, scenarios and exercises are authored for this Academy with AI assistance and review. External resources keep their publishers’ terms. A grade label suggests a starting level; it does not establish alignment with your school’s complete requirements.