Integrate evidence functionally

Supplied materials

• Paper and pencil, or a browser text area. All named people/events/records are fictional learning inputs.
• Worked case: Excerpt A: Text: Jo folded the notes twice, lets Lea go first, then returns to speak. Question: How do these actions reveal a change in Jo? Excerpt B: Draft opening: Jo’s hesitation changes into a limited willingness to participate in this scene. Excerpt C: Draft: Jo folded the notes twice; repeating a preparation action can suggest hesitation, though it does not prove fear. Excerpt D: Conclusion: Jo’s return supports a reading of limited participation after initial hesitation.
• Primary check: Excerpt A: Text: one second at the doorway fills five sentences; six weeks of practice fill one sentence. Question: How does the time allocation shape emphasis? Excerpt B: Draft body: Repeating the note-folding action slows the threshold moment and draws attention to Jo’s hesitation. Excerpt C: Draft: "Jo folded the notes twice." The paragraph stops without explaining what the detail contributes. Excerpt D: Conclusion: One folded note proves every person always fears public speaking.

Learn the idea

A literary detail needs reasoning that explains its relevance. A quotation by itself is not analysis. Paraphrase can supply evidence when its context and connection are clear.

Identify the supplied evidence and the reasoning attached to it. Add the missing connection if the text merely drops a quotation.

Original worked input: Original excerpt C: Draft: Jo folded the notes twice; repeating a preparation action can suggest hesitation, though it does not prove fear. The task is to integrate evidence functionally. The answer is “detail followed by analysis”. Evidence: Draft: Jo folded the notes twice; repeating a preparation action can suggest hesitation, though it does not prove fear. Reasoning: detail followed by analysis is supported because a stated action is followed by an explanation of why it matters to the reading. More quoted words do not automatically strengthen analysis.

1. Read the supplied worked case and identify the part named in this lesson. An adult can model unfamiliar words.
2. Identify the supplied evidence and the reasoning attached to it. Add the missing connection if the text merely drops a quotation.
3. Check the worked solution: detail followed by analysis. Evidence: Draft: Jo folded the notes twice; repeating a preparation action can suggest hesitation, though it does not prove fear. Reasoning: detail followed by analysis is supported because a stated action is followed by an explanation of why it matters to the reading. More quoted words do not automatically strengthen analysis.
4. Use the new primary and practice cases. Give a reason from the actual words before checking the feedback.

Check your reasoning

Your answer is temporary and is not saved to an account. Download your current answer before leaving or reloading. Written work on paper or in another app stays in your own file.

Take it further

Changed-input task: Original excerpt C: Draft: In the supplied ending Jo removes the label and exposes the tear; this is a source-contextualized paraphrase. Give an evidence-based answer before looking at the model. Expected reasoning: Evidence: Draft: In the supplied ending Jo removes the label and exposes the tear; this is a source-contextualized paraphrase. Reasoning: paraphrase with source context is supported because new wording preserves the actions while naming the supplied scene context. More quoted words do not automatically strengthen analysis. Then write a brief alternative sentence, paragraph, source note or scene that demonstrates the same operation; label new fictional details and preserve source limits.

Nothing here is saved to an account or sent to a teacher. The answer download includes your current choice and any checked feedback. It does not include choices from the separate More practice section. Download that section separately.