Revise an activity decision when the report changes
See this course’s project requirements
An air-quality interpretation card with pollutant/time metadata, AQI categories, official guidance and revised activity choices for fictional users.
Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.
What to include
- Separate weather, appearance and pollutant information.
- Compare place, pollutant, time and report type.
- Classify all supplied category boundaries.
- Match the particle guide to fictional group/activity facts.
- Compare indoor alternatives with scope and heat/source limits.
- Document a changed report and revised decision without personal health data.
Review and revise
Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.
- Method: applies the course-specific rules to the supplied cases with visible intermediate work.
- Accuracy: results agree with the stated facts, units, boundaries and independent checks.
- Reasoning: explains why the result follows and identifies a limitation or unresolved question.
- Transfer: completes changed cases and revises the final project when a relevant assumption changes.
Want more background?
The idea in everyday life
Fictional plan record: teenager’s particle AQI 130 at 14:00 supported a shorter, less intense activity. Updated matching location/pollutant card at 15:00 gives 170. The particle guide’s151–200 advice is supplied in lesson 4. No activity has been performed.
A decision should be revisited when location, pollutant, time or official guidance changes. Preserve the previous basis and the updated reason. A source check is not an actual exposure test or a medical result. A learner can complete this fictional decision card without sharing health information or undertaking the activity.
Revise an activity decision when the report changes — worked practice
A decision should be revisited when location, pollutant, time or official guidance changes. Preserve the previous basis and the updated reason. A source check is not an actual exposure test or a medical result. A learner can complete this fictional decision card without sharing health information or undertaking the activity.
Fictional plan record: teenager’s particle AQI 130 at 14:00 supported a shorter, less intense activity. Updated matching location/pollutant card at 15:00 gives 170. The particle guide’s151–200 advice is supplied in lesson 4. No activity has been performed.
1. 1. Freshness
Verify the matching report’s updated fields.
You should see: Same place/particle/current type; new 15:00 timestamp.
2. 2. Category
Classify the new 170.
You should see: Unhealthy rather than the previous sensitive-group-only range.
3. 3. Revise
Update the long/intense-activity decision from the applicable guide.
You should see: Avoid long/intense outdoor activity; consider rescheduling or an appropriate alternative setting.
4. 4. Record
Write old basis, new basis, choice and limits in the final card.
You should see: The record documents guidance reasoning, not health outcomes or performed exposure.
What to finish
A final air-quality card with old/new reports, revised choice and explicit evidence limits.
Watch for this
The learner demonstrates reading metadata, categories and advice. The fictional activity was not performed, so exposure and health outcomes remain untested.
How can I tell I understand it?
Classify a later report while retaining pollutant, group and source conditions.
Quick knowledge check
Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.
You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.
Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.
Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.
Go to the knowledge checkTools, templates, and lesson sources
Tools and templates
Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.
Sources and further reading
Explore the references behind this lesson.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
Web open/search showed the official page, its topic heading and relevant concept description. This is a content/source check, not a provider endorsement.
Access: Official page retrieved with the web reader on 2026-10-01; interactive tools and videos were not certified by retrieval.
Reuse: Original fictional teaching cases, calculations, questions and examples; link and short factual paraphrase only. No copied source exercises or illustrations.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
Web open/search showed the official page, its topic heading and relevant concept description. This is a content/source check, not a provider endorsement.
Access: Official page retrieved with the web reader on 2026-10-01; interactive tools and videos were not certified by retrieval.
Reuse: Original fictional teaching cases, calculations, questions and examples; link and short factual paraphrase only. No copied source exercises or illustrations.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
Web open/search showed the official page, its topic heading and relevant concept description. This is a content/source check, not a provider endorsement.
Access: Official page retrieved with the web reader on 2026-10-01; interactive tools and videos were not certified by retrieval.
Reuse: Original fictional teaching cases, calculations, questions and examples; link and short factual paraphrase only. No copied source exercises or illustrations.
Report a problem with this lesson
Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.