Compare runoff and infiltration from a supplied budget
See this course’s project requirements
A fictional watershed diagram tracking runoff, infiltration, groundwater and pollution paths, with a supported upstream/downstream prevention choice.
Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.
What to include
- Draw outlet-specific and nested drainage boundaries.
- Label water stores, phase changes and land/plant routes.
- Balance supplied rain budgets and compare fractions.
- Read groundwater/stream exchange cross-sections.
- Trace a possible pollution route without inventing treatment.
- Explain a responsible paper prevention choice and include all changed cases.
Review and revise
Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.
- Method: applies the course-specific rules to the supplied cases with visible intermediate work.
- Accuracy: results agree with the stated facts, units, boundaries and independent checks.
- Reasoning: explains why the result follows and identifies a limitation or unresolved question.
- Transfer: completes changed cases and revises the final project when a relevant assumption changes.
Want more background?
The idea in everyday life
Original matched rain exercise:100 volume units input to each site. Site V: runoff 30, infiltration 60, evaporation/storage 10. Site P: runoff 70, infiltration 20, evaporation/storage 10. Same stated storm interval; other site differences are not fully measured.
A water budget accounts for an input over a stated place and interval. Surface cover, soil, slope and rainfall conditions can affect runoff and infiltration; a budget does not isolate one cause unless the comparison supplies suitable conditions. All fractions here are fictional model outcomes, not universal pavement or soil coefficients.
Compare runoff and infiltration from a supplied budget — worked practice
A water budget accounts for an input over a stated place and interval. Surface cover, soil, slope and rainfall conditions can affect runoff and infiltration; a budget does not isolate one cause unless the comparison supplies suitable conditions. All fractions here are fictional model outcomes, not universal pavement or soil coefficients.
Original matched rain exercise:100 volume units input to each site. Site V: runoff 30, infiltration 60, evaporation/storage 10. Site P: runoff 70, infiltration 20, evaporation/storage 10. Same stated storm interval; other site differences are not fully measured.
1. 1. Balance
Add each site’s listed routes.
You should see: V30+60+10=100; P70+20+10=100.
2. 2. Fraction
Calculate runoff fractions.
You should see: V0.30; P0.70.
3. 3. Compare
Calculate the supplied runoff difference.
You should see: P sends 40 more units to surface runoff.
4. 4. Limit
Explain what the data do not isolate.
You should see: The budgets compare routes; unmeasured site conditions prevent attributing all difference to one factor.
What to finish
Two water budgets with fractions, differences and assumptions.
Watch for this
The numbers are supplied teaching budgets, and real runoff depends on multiple conditions. A universal causal coefficient would overstate them.
How can I tell I understand it?
Recalculate a changed route fraction without dropping the other budget stores.
Quick knowledge check
Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.
You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.
Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.
Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.
Go to the knowledge checkTools, templates, and lesson sources
Tools and templates
Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.
Sources and further reading
Explore the references behind this lesson.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
Web open/search showed the official page, its topic heading and relevant concept description. This is a content/source check, not a provider endorsement.
Access: Official page retrieved with the web reader on 2026-10-01; interactive tools and videos were not certified by retrieval.
Reuse: Original fictional teaching cases, calculations, questions and examples; link and short factual paraphrase only. No copied source exercises or illustrations.
Report a problem with this lesson
Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.