Identify the paper and question
See this course’s project requirements
An evidence folder containing a paper-type note, design map, checked results, corrected claim, two-paper comparison, and a 150–250-word evidence brief.
Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.
What to include
- Identify publication type, specific question, and scope for P1.
- Map the design and check all rates with their denominators.
- Correct the overclaim and compare P1 with P2.
- Write the final brief with evidence IDs, limitations, and a useful next test.
Review and revise
Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.
- Calculations and units match the supplied counts.
- Design descriptions separate assignment, recruitment, and measurement.
- Claims stay within tested populations and outcomes.
- The synthesis preserves disagreement and labels all practice data fictional.
Want more background?
The idea in everyday life
Original fictional paper P1, “Signs and Sorting”: research question—do picture labels change sorting accuracy at one campus recycling station? Methods—40 volunteers randomly assigned to picture labels or text labels, 20 per group, one supervised session, identical items. Results—picture group 16/20 correct; text group 12/20 correct. Discussion—picture labels may help in this setting; volunteers and one session limit broader conclusions. No uncertainty interval or replication is supplied. This is a teaching example, not a published study.
First learn what kind of document you have and what question it can answer.
Identify the paper and question: guided practice
First learn what kind of document you have and what question it can answer.
Use paper or a free local text editor. This is an original fictional practice case; do not submit its records to a real service. Start this lesson with these facts, even if an earlier variation changed them. Original fictional paper P1, “Signs and Sorting”: research question—do picture labels change sorting accuracy at one campus recycling station? Methods—40 volunteers randomly assigned to picture labels or text labels, 20 per group, one supervised session, identical items. Results—picture group 16/20 correct; text group 12/20 correct. Discussion—picture labels may help in this setting; volunteers and one session limit broader conclusions. No uncertainty interval or replication is supplied. This is a teaching example, not a published study.
1. Label the document
Record P1 as a fictional empirical research report.
You should see: P1 reports one original comparison; it is neither a review nor real published evidence.
Different document types support different uses.
2. Find the question
Rewrite the study question with the intervention and measured result.
You should see: Do picture labels improve correct sorting compared with text labels at this station?
A precise question limits the claim you will evaluate.
3. Separate context
Mark the campus, volunteers, and one-session scope.
You should see: Population: 40 volunteers; setting: one station; observation window: one session.
Scope helps prevent accidental generalization.
4. Plan reading
List where to find assignment, outcome numbers, and limitations.
You should see: Methods for assignment; results for numbers; discussion for interpretation and stated limits.
A reading route helps you check claims against the right evidence.
What to finish
Identify the paper and question record with the worked decisions and changed-case check.
Watch for this
Treating a summary or preprint label as a substitute for reading the study.
How can I tell I understand it?
Identify the research question and publication type before detailed reading. Explain the evidence behind the result and correct any mismatch.
Quick knowledge check
Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.
You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.
Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.
Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.
Go to the knowledge checkOptional course overview video
How to Read a Scholarly Article
From libncsu. Watch here or open it on YouTube .
Optional course overview. Follow the written steps below at your own pace.Tools, templates, and lesson sources
Tools and templates
Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.
Sources and further reading
Explore the references behind this lesson.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12
Inspected article types, preprints, methods/results emphasis, and active reading guidance.
Access: Public page or PDF inspected without payment or institutional sign-in on September 12, 2026. Optional external accounts are unnecessary for this course.
Reuse: Link and original paraphrase only. Public access does not grant blanket reuse; no provider text, figures, or exercises are reproduced.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12
Inspected primary-versus-review distinction, methods mapping, results-versus-interpretation, and reading limits.
Access: Public page or PDF inspected without payment or institutional sign-in on September 12, 2026. Optional external accounts are unnecessary for this course.
Reuse: Link and original paraphrase only. Public access does not grant blanket reuse; no provider text, figures, or exercises are reproduced.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12
Watch URL discovered through web search or an inspected official page; YouTube oEmbed returned this exact title and channel. Metadata verified; full playback and captions were not tested.
Access: Public YouTube metadata returned without sign-in on September 12, 2026. The video is optional; playback and caption availability were not tested.
Reuse: Link and original paraphrase only. Public access does not grant blanket reuse; no provider text, figures, or exercises are reproduced.
Report a problem with this lesson
Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.