Collect input without dominance
See this course’s project requirements
A group-decision packet with scope, input rounds, eligibility and scores, vote record, concern-based revision, and follow-through log.
Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.
What to include
- State decision authority, limits, and a neutral question.
- Provide a participation round with a written-input option.
- Apply mandatory screens and preference scores consistently.
- Record both ballots, the concern, and the location revision.
- Create a task log and a trigger for reconsidering the choice.
Review and revise
Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.
- All four members have a usable input route.
- Eligibility and score arithmetic match supplied facts.
- The vote threshold and tie process are applied correctly.
- The final record preserves dissent and assigns follow-through.
Want more background?
The idea in everyday life
Four fictional members: Jo proposes games; Ren proposes a walk; Alex prefers drawing; Kim has not spoken and prefers written input. Use two minutes of private idea writing, then one idea per person in a round. Passing is allowed. Critiques wait until all ideas are recorded.
Separate idea collection from evaluation so speed and volume do not control the options.
Collect input without dominance: guided practice
Separate idea collection from evaluation so speed and volume do not control the options.
Use paper or a free local text editor. This is an original fictional practice case; do not submit its records to a real service. Start this lesson with these facts, even if an earlier variation changed them. Four fictional members: Jo proposes games; Ren proposes a walk; Alex prefers drawing; Kim has not spoken and prefers written input. Use two minutes of private idea writing, then one idea per person in a round. Passing is allowed. Critiques wait until all ideas are recorded.
1. Prepare the round
Write the collection rule and a written-input option.
You should see: Two minutes private writing; one contribution each; pass or write instead of speaking.
Different formats widen participation without requiring disclosure.
2. Capture ideas
Record all three named activities and Kim’s written idea: cooperative puzzle.
You should see: Games, walk, drawing, cooperative puzzle.
Recording before judging prevents early ideas from crowding out later ones.
3. Handle dominance
Draft a response when Jo starts a second long speech.
You should see: We have your idea recorded; let’s finish the first round before returning to comments.
The intervention protects the agreed process rather than attacking Jo.
4. Check completeness
Count members with an offered input route and options captured.
You should see: Four members have an input route; four options are recorded.
A silent person should not automatically be counted as agreeing.
What to finish
Collect input without dominance record with the worked decisions and changed-case check.
Watch for this
Counting silence as consent or making people reveal personal reasons for a participation preference.
How can I tell I understand it?
Use a participation structure that captures every member’s ideas. Explain the evidence behind the result and correct any mismatch.
Quick knowledge check
Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.
You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.
Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.
Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.
Go to the knowledge checkOptional course overview video · same video as Lesson 1
Group Decision-Making
From Stephen Klien. Watch here or open it on YouTube .
Optional course overview. Follow the written steps below at your own pace.Tools, templates, and lesson sources
Tools and templates
Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.
Sources and further reading
Explore the references behind this lesson.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12
Inspected inclusive input, shared purpose, consensus process, and limits.
Access: Public page or PDF inspected without payment or institutional sign-in on September 12, 2026. Optional external accounts are unnecessary for this course.
Reuse: Link and original paraphrase only. Public access does not grant blanket reuse; no provider text, figures, or exercises are reproduced.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12
Inspected process neutrality, participation structure, ground rules, and accessibility.
Access: Public page or PDF inspected without payment or institutional sign-in on September 12, 2026. Optional external accounts are unnecessary for this course.
Reuse: Link and original paraphrase only. Public access does not grant blanket reuse; no provider text, figures, or exercises are reproduced.
Report a problem with this lesson
Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.