The Life Starter
0 of 6 complete0%
Course Library · Lesson 5 of 6
Money · Guided lesson

Test sensitivity and distribution

About 13 minutes · 3 reading + 10 practice and checks
Time includes reading, practice, and questions. Extra videos or further study are optional.
See this course’s project requirements

A financial appraisal of a fictional community investment with counterfactual, incremental costs, discounted values, distribution and sensitivity.

Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.

What to include

  • A baseline/project comparison with incremental service and scope.
  • An incremental resource-cost and transfer-incidence table.
  • A dated present-value worksheet with real/nominal consistency.
  • A deduplicated benefit inventory with valuation limits.
  • A base/low net-value table and distribution note.
  • A completed fictional public-spending financial appraisal.

Review and revise

Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.

  • All supplied records reconcile and the decision uses the named case rules.
  • Calculations show units, intermediate values and a second check.
  • Changed-input practice revises the affected result and identifies uncertainty.
  • The final project combines six lesson records, separates fictional assumptions from current rules, and states a supported next step.
Open the full course project
Want more background?
Before you begin

The idea in everyday life

This is an original fictional practice case. No account, payment, personal record or outside participation is required. Present resource costs $5,000; present monetized benefits $6,000 in base case, $4,000 in low case. Users pay $800 fees to operator; this transfer is separate from these resource totals.

The idea

A positive aggregate total does not show who gains or loses; test the assumptions that can reverse the result.

Follow along

Test sensitivity and distribution — worked practice

A positive aggregate total does not show who gains or loses; test the assumptions that can reverse the result.

Use paper or a local table; label all amounts as fictional USD unless the case names another unit. Present resource costs $5,000; present monetized benefits $6,000 in base case, $4,000 in low case. Users pay $800 fees to operator; this transfer is separate from these resource totals.

Sensitivity and distribution inputs

Paste at A1.

AInput or recordBSupplied value
Present resource cost USD5000
Base present monetized benefit USD6000
Low present monetized benefit USD4000
User fee transfer USD800
Transfer treatmentSeparate distribution record

Copy as plain text
  1. 1. Step 1: Calculate base net value

    Calculate base net value.

    You should see: 6000−5000=$1,000.

    A positive aggregate total does not show who gains or loses; test the assumptions that can reverse the result.

  2. 2. Step 2: Calculate low-case net value

    Calculate low-case net value.

    You should see: 4000−5000=−$1,000.

    Keep this intermediate result so the final decision can be checked.

  3. 3. Step 3: Identify the conclusion-sensitive assumption

    Identify the conclusion-sensitive assumption.

    You should see: Benefit level changes the sign; neither scenario is a prediction.

    Keep this intermediate result so the final decision can be checked.

  4. 4. Step 4: Record distribution separately

    Record distribution separately.

    You should see: Users bear $800 fees and operator receives them; examine access burden even where aggregate resource net value is positive.

    Keep this intermediate result so the final decision can be checked.

Now change one thing

Low-case benefits become $4,500 with resource costs still $5,000. Enter the signed net value, using a minus sign if negative.

Your work

What to finish

A base/low net-value table and distribution note.

Common mistake

Watch for this

Hiding a negative sensitivity case because the base total looks favorable.

How can I tell I understand it?

Calculate public-appraisal sensitivity and record who bears transfers and benefits on the supplied changed case while preserving the stated rule and checking the final record.

Try 3 questions

Quick knowledge check

Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.

Not yet passed

You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.

1Present benefits $7,000 less costs $6,000: net value?
2A low assumption makes net value negative. What should the brief state?
3A project has positive net resource value but fees block some people’s access. What remains relevant?
0 of 3 answeredApply the lesson to a short question, then review the explanation.
5
Finish this lesson

Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.

Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.

Go to the knowledge check
Tools, templates, and lesson sources

Tools and templates

Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.

Sources and further reading

Explore the references behind this lesson.

EPA — Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses, 3rd Edition
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01

Official page opened/read during Money expansion authoring; checked the relevant concept and access state. These sources do not establish funding eligibility.

Access: Readable official webpage inspected with the web reader on 2026-10-01. No interactive-tool operation is claimed.

Reuse: Original fictional practice, questions and calculations; paraphrased concepts with a source link. No source exercise copied.

EPA — Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses: Discounting Future Benefits and Costs (2010 archived chapter)
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01

Official page opened/read during Money expansion authoring; checked the relevant concept and access state. These sources do not establish funding eligibility.

Access: Readable archived EPA Chapter 6 PDF inspected for the present-value method only; this is not current required discount-rate guidance.

Reuse: Original fictional practice, questions and calculations; paraphrased concepts with a source link. No source exercise copied.

EPA — Economic and Cost Analysis for Air Pollution Regulations
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01

Official page opened/read during Money expansion authoring; checked the relevant concept and access state. These sources do not establish funding eligibility.

Access: Readable official webpage inspected with the web reader on 2026-10-01. No interactive-tool operation is claimed.

Reuse: Original fictional practice, questions and calculations; paraphrased concepts with a source link. No source exercise copied.

Report a problem with this lesson

Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.

No sign-in needed.