Compare two feasible route assignments
See this course’s project requirements
A tested two-worker dispatch plan using supplied travel times, skill matches, appointment windows and breaks, plus a disruption revision and customer-update log.
Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.
What to include
- Build a constraint matrix before allocating routes; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
- Add J3 and return travel for full route end; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
- Save the paired assignment with all checks visible; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
- Recommend from comparable evidence and note the 10-minute assumption gap; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
- Draft a revised dispatch/customer update with the changed times; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
- Assemble dispatch packet and next verification action; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
Review and revise
Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.
- The final packet uses the supplied task-specific constraints and all six records agree.
- Every result can be traced to an identifier, input, calculation or stated decision rule.
- Changed-case practice updates dependent records and keeps holds or uncertainty visible.
- The packet states the learner role, authority boundary and specific next verification needed before real work.
Want more background?
The idea in everyday life
Original fictional workplace practice; paper or a local document is sufficient. The rules and records below are supplied for this exercise, not asserted universal workplace policy. Oak Plan A: N handles J1/J3 route 140 min; M handles J2 route 60 min, total 200. Plan B: M handles J1/J3 route 140; N does not have Y and J2 is left unassigned. Proposed claim: Plan B uses only 140 minutes and is better.
Comparing routes requires the same complete jobs and accounted travel; an apparently shorter plan that omits a job is not a fair comparison.
Compare two feasible route assignments — worked practice
Comparing routes requires the same complete jobs and accounted travel; an apparently shorter plan that omits a job is not a fair comparison.
Oak Plan A: N handles J1/J3 route 140 min; M handles J2 route 60 min, total 200. Plan B: M handles J1/J3 route 140; N does not have Y and J2 is left unassigned. Proposed claim: Plan B uses only 140 minutes and is better. Use paper or a local document. Preserve the original case and make a separate changed-case record.
1. Step 1
Check coverage before comparing times.
You should see: Plan A covers 3 jobs; Plan B covers 2 and misses J2.
Keep the stated identifier, unit and policy alongside this result so another reader can check it.
2. Step 2
Separate feasibility from objective value.
You should see: Plan B is not a complete feasible alternative.
Keep the stated identifier, unit and policy alongside this result so another reader can check it.
3. Step 3
Use a second complete hypothetical Plan C for comparison.
You should see: Supplied Plan C covers three jobs in 210 minutes with all skills/windows checked.
Keep the stated identifier, unit and policy alongside this result so another reader can check it.
4. Step 4
Recommend from comparable evidence and note the 10-minute assumption gap.
You should see: A route comparison favoring Plan A at 200 minutes over verified Plan C at 210 minutes while excluding incomplete Plan B.
Keep the stated identifier, unit and policy alongside this result so another reader can check it.
What to finish
Recommend from comparable evidence and note the 10-minute assumption gap; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
Watch for this
Choosing a low route-time total that quietly leaves required work undone.
How can I tell I understand it?
Using the supplied identifiers, I can recommend from comparable evidence and note the 10-minute assumption gap. My changed-case record names the revised condition and explains which dependent decision it changes.
Quick knowledge check
Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.
You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.
Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.
Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.
Go to the knowledge checkTools, templates, and lesson sources
Tools and templates
Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.
Sources and further reading
Explore the references behind this lesson.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
Occupational task and responsibility context; the exercise policies and quantities are original fictional inputs. Page title and relevant content inspected; no interactive controls or credential process tested.
Access: Readable official page retrieved with the web reader on 2026-10-01.
Reuse: All teaching cases, data, worked steps and questions are original. Link and limited paraphrase for context; no copied source exercises.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
Occupational task and responsibility context; the exercise policies and quantities are original fictional inputs. Page title and relevant content inspected; no interactive controls or credential process tested.
Access: Readable official page retrieved with the web reader on 2026-10-01.
Reuse: All teaching cases, data, worked steps and questions are original. Link and limited paraphrase for context; no copied source exercises.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
Public agency or educational context; no source exercises are copied and no simulated threshold is presented as an official rule. The direct-access limitation is preserved; official search-retrieved context supports the stated scope only.
Access: Official primary-page summary was available in web search; direct page retrieval was blocked in this environment. Full page and interactive operation are not claimed.
Reuse: All teaching cases, data, worked steps and questions are original. Link and limited paraphrase for context; no copied source exercises.
Report a problem with this lesson
Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.