Review and revise the exhibition
See this course’s project requirements
A six-object exhibition storyboard with an interpretive question, evidence notes, original labels, an accessible reading order, and a revision log.
Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.
What to include
- A visitor brief with title, question, scope and intended experience.
- An evidence ledger for the collection with special notes on uncertain provenance.
- A six-object selection matrix with section, role, evidence and exclusion notes.
- Six original object labels with identifiers, concise interpretation and evidence limits.
- A six-object storyboard with headings, descriptions and a complete text reading version.
- A complete exhibition packet with corrected labels, rights note and revision evidence.
Review and revise
Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.
- Every required section is present and traceable to the supplied case facts.
- Decisions separate known facts, assumptions, and unresolved questions.
- Records, calculations, and instructions agree with each other and the stated rules.
- The final revision addresses a changed case and explains what someone should do next.
Want more background?
The idea in everyday life
Original fictional North Quay collection cards: O1 weekly school timetable, 1980, printed by North Quay School, weekday subject grid; no individual owner recorded. O2 paper bus pass, 1992, Route 4 printed on it; holder and actual trips unknown. O3 cloth pencil case, 2001 in a donor note, visible stitched repair; note says used at college, but that claim is unverified. O4 three handwritten Spanish-verb revision cards, 2010 in the collection register; writer unknown. O5 printed calendar, 2024, fictional contributor Mina’s record: Tuesday work shift 17:00–21:00 and Wednesday seminar 10:00; permission for this invented text is included. O6 study-group note, 2016 in the register: “Bring chapter 3 notes”; author and group members unknown. O7 decorative vase, 1970 in the register, no recorded connection to learning. O8 unmarked key, date and use unknown. All descriptions and records are invented for this course; no real collection images are needed. Final draft includes O1–O6 in three sections and uses original text only. Supplied simulated review comments: R1 “I cannot match two labels to objects because their IDs are missing.” R2 “The bus label says a student owned it, but the card does not identify the holder.” R3 “The pairs make it easier to compare time and tools.” Required revisions: add missing IDs, remove unsupported O2 ownership claim, retain the useful paired structure. No real visitor test was conducted.
Review checks whether the evidence, labels and visitor path work together.
Review and revise the exhibition — guided practice
Use specific critique to improve the interpretation and final packet.
Use a text editor, a free document editor, or paper. Start from the following fictional records; they reset this lesson even if your earlier answer differed. Original fictional North Quay collection cards: O1 weekly school timetable, 1980, printed by North Quay School, weekday subject grid; no individual owner recorded. O2 paper bus pass, 1992, Route 4 printed on it; holder and actual trips unknown. O3 cloth pencil case, 2001 in a donor note, visible stitched repair; note says used at college, but that claim is unverified. O4 three handwritten Spanish-verb revision cards, 2010 in the collection register; writer unknown. O5 printed calendar, 2024, fictional contributor Mina’s record: Tuesday work shift 17:00–21:00 and Wednesday seminar 10:00; permission for this invented text is included. O6 study-group note, 2016 in the register: “Bring chapter 3 notes”; author and group members unknown. O7 decorative vase, 1970 in the register, no recorded connection to learning. O8 unmarked key, date and use unknown. All descriptions and records are invented for this course; no real collection images are needed. Final draft includes O1–O6 in three sections and uses original text only. Supplied simulated review comments: R1 “I cannot match two labels to objects because their IDs are missing.” R2 “The bus label says a student owned it, but the card does not identify the holder.” R3 “The pairs make it easier to compare time and tools.” Required revisions: add missing IDs, remove unsupported O2 ownership claim, retain the useful paired structure. No real visitor test was conducted.
1. Turn comments into changes
Record each comment, its evidence and the intended response.
You should see: R1 identifier repair; R2 factual repair; R3 retain paired structure.
An action log connects critique with decisions.
2. Repair the labels
Restore the correct IDs from the selection and remove the invented ownership.
You should see: Six IDs present; O2 holder/use remains unknown.
Fixes should restore traceability and honest interpretation.
3. Check rights and scope
Record that all six cards, descriptions and labels are original fictional text.
You should see: No third-party images or objects are being redistributed.
The final packet should identify what materials it actually uses.
4. Assemble and review
Combine brief, ledger, selection, labels, reading order and revision log.
You should see: One coherent six-object exhibition plan, clearly labeled fictional.
The finished artifact preserves both the experience and the evidence behind it.
What to finish
A complete exhibition packet with corrected labels, rights note and revision evidence.
Watch for this
Calling a simulated critique a completed public visitor study or treating positive feedback as proof that every claim is accurate.
How can I tell I understand it?
Check your result against the worked example, then explain the changed case without using an unstated assumption.
Quick knowledge check
Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.
You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.
Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.
Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.
Go to the knowledge checkOptional course overview video · same video as Lesson 1
What's a Curator? | The Art Assignment | PBS Digital Studios
From The Art Assignment. Watch here or open it on YouTube .
Optional course overview. Follow the written steps below at your own pace.Tools, templates, and lesson sources
Tools and templates
Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.
Sources and further reading
Explore the references behind this lesson.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12
Inspected planning and interpretive design stages; the course is a small text-only storyboard, not a physical exhibit specification.
Access: Public page inspected without an account.
Reuse: Reference link only. Course prose and practice data are original; no third-party text, figures, or templates are reproduced.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12
Inspected museum discussion of clear, visitor-oriented gallery text.
Access: Public museum article; no account.
Reuse: Reference only; no museum text, object photographs or example labels reproduced.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12
Inspected accessibility guidance index and interpretive-media considerations. No claim that a text storyboard certifies a physical installation.
Access: Public page inspected without an account.
Reuse: Reference link only. Course prose and practice data are original; no third-party text, figures, or templates are reproduced.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12
Inspected CC0-marked collection assets and rights information; open access does not mean every object has identical rights.
Access: Public museum page; no account needed to read.
Reuse: No collection assets downloaded or copied. All practice object cards and labels are original.
Report a problem with this lesson
Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.