Code transcript evidence
See this course’s project requirements
A service-research brief with neutral interview questions, a consent plan, coded fictional transcripts, and findings linked to evidence.
Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.
What to include
- A one-page research brief with question, scope and known evidence limits.
- A five-prompt interview guide with a neutral follow-up probe.
- A practice consent script and data-lifecycle table.
- A three-row coded evidence table with interpretation and uncertainty columns.
- A findings map with supporting IDs, contrary evidence, and open questions.
- A complete research packet and concise readout with findings, limits, owner and next evidence needs.
Review and revise
Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.
- Every required section is present and traceable to the supplied case facts.
- Decisions separate known facts, assumptions, and unresolved questions.
- Records, calculations, and instructions agree with each other and the stated rules.
- The final revision addresses a changed case and explains what someone should do next.
Want more background?
The idea in everyday life
All North Room service records are fictional. Research question: how do members decide when and how to reserve an evening studio? Three simulated transcripts, not a representative sample: P1 Ari: “The page said open six to nine. I could not tell whether I could start at eight, so I called before booking.” P2 Bo: “Booking a seven o’clock slot worked. The reminder arrived after I had already left home; I wanted it earlier.” P3 Cam: “I like checking times quietly online first. I also could not tell the latest start time, but the desk explained it and I booked.” These statements report experiences; no screen interaction was directly observed. Use evidence IDs E1=P1 statement about latest start, E2=P2 statement about reminder arrival, E3=P3 statement about quiet browsing and latest start. Allowed starter codes: start-time clarity, reminder timing, preferred support channel. A row may have more than one code. Include columns evidence ID, participant ID, stated experience, code, interpretation and uncertainty.
A code helps find evidence; it does not turn an inference into a fact.
Code transcript evidence — guided practice
Create evidence rows that separate statements from interpretations.
Use a text editor, a free document editor, or paper. Start from the following fictional records; they reset this lesson even if your earlier answer differed. All North Room service records are fictional. Research question: how do members decide when and how to reserve an evening studio? Three simulated transcripts, not a representative sample: P1 Ari: “The page said open six to nine. I could not tell whether I could start at eight, so I called before booking.” P2 Bo: “Booking a seven o’clock slot worked. The reminder arrived after I had already left home; I wanted it earlier.” P3 Cam: “I like checking times quietly online first. I also could not tell the latest start time, but the desk explained it and I booked.” These statements report experiences; no screen interaction was directly observed. Use evidence IDs E1=P1 statement about latest start, E2=P2 statement about reminder arrival, E3=P3 statement about quiet browsing and latest start. Allowed starter codes: start-time clarity, reminder timing, preferred support channel. A row may have more than one code. Include columns evidence ID, participant ID, stated experience, code, interpretation and uncertainty.
1. Extract factual evidence rows
Paraphrase each statement without adding a cause.
You should see: E1 unclear latest start; E2 reminder after departure; E3 online preference plus unclear latest start.
The row must remain traceable to what was actually said.
2. Apply codes
Assign labels describing the relevant topic.
You should see: E1 start-time clarity; E2 reminder timing; E3 start-time clarity and preferred support channel.
A shared code makes related evidence retrievable.
3. Separate interpretation
Label possible implications as interpretations.
You should see: Possible need for clearer latest-start information.
An interpretation can be reasonable without being directly observed.
4. Record uncertainty
State missing evidence that could change the explanation.
You should see: No screen observation; actual published rules and delivery logs unknown.
Alternative explanations remain possible.
What to finish
A three-row coded evidence table with interpretation and uncertainty columns.
Watch for this
Writing “the page is broken” in an observation column when the transcript only reports uncertainty.
How can I tell I understand it?
Check your result against the worked example, then explain the changed case without using an unstated assumption.
Quick knowledge check
Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.
You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.
Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.
Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.
Go to the knowledge checkOptional course overview video · same video as Lesson 1
The 3 Types of User Interviews: Structured, Semi-Structured, and Unstructured
From NNgroup. Watch here or open it on YouTube .
Optional course overview. Follow the written steps below at your own pace.Tools, templates, and lesson sources
Tools and templates
Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.
Sources and further reading
Explore the references behind this lesson.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12
Inspected planning, neutral questions, listening and interview structure.
Access: Public official service manual; no account.
Reuse: Reference only. Site indicates Open Government Licence v3.0 except where stated; all course prompts and transcripts are original.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12
Inspected observations, grouping evidence and developing findings without jumping directly to solutions.
Access: Public official service manual; no account.
Reuse: Reference only; no templates or example participant material copied.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12
Inspected informed voluntary consent and explaining data use; UK organizational context, not a universal legal checklist.
Access: Public official service manual; no account.
Reuse: Reference only; the practice protocol is an original fictional exercise.
Report a problem with this lesson
Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.