The Life Starter
0 of 6 complete0%
Course Library · Lesson 2 of 6
Life · Guided lesson

Test if-then reasoning

About 24 minutes · 6 reading + 18 practice and checks
Time includes reading, practice, and questions. Extra videos or further study are optional.
See this course’s project requirements

An argument-audit packet with a premise map, conditional tests, counterexamples, repaired reasoning, certainty labels, and a final evidence-based room recommendation.

Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.

What to include

  • Identify premises, conclusion, and assumptions.
  • Test conditional direction and create valid counterexamples.
  • Explain and repair irrelevant or incomplete reasons.
  • Distinguish rule-based conclusions from uncertain predictions.
  • Produce the final map with a clear change trigger.

Review and revise

Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.

  • Argument roles are correctly identified.
  • Counterexamples have the required true-condition/false-result structure.
  • Revisions address the actual evidence gap.
  • Final conclusions follow the supplied facts without hidden assumptions.
Open the full course project
Want more background?
Before you begin

The idea in everyday life

Fictional club policy: if a room is booked, its calendar shows a blue block. Room B shows a blue block. Blue blocks can also mark maintenance. Room C has no blue block. Assume the rule is always followed in this exercise.

The idea

If A guarantees B, observing B does not necessarily prove A.

Follow along

Test if-then reasoning: guided practice

If A guarantees B, observing B does not necessarily prove A.

Use paper or a free local text editor. This is an original fictional practice case; do not submit its records to a real service. Start this lesson with these facts, even if an earlier variation changed them. Fictional club policy: if a room is booked, its calendar shows a blue block. Room B shows a blue block. Blue blocks can also mark maintenance. Room C has no blue block. Assume the rule is always followed in this exercise.

  1. 1. Write the condition

    Translate the rule as booked → blue block.

    You should see: Booked rooms must show blue; the rule is one-way.

    Direction matters in conditional reasoning.

  2. 2. Test B

    Ask whether maintenance could explain B’s blue block.

    You should see: B may be booked or under maintenance; booking is not established.

    Another cause of the signal blocks the reverse inference.

  3. 3. Test C

    Use the absence of a required signal.

    You should see: C is not booked under the assumed rule because it has no blue block.

    If booking always creates blue, no blue rules booking out.

  4. 4. Write a valid check

    Specify how to settle B’s status.

    You should see: Read B’s reservation record instead of inferring booking from color alone.

    Additional evidence can resolve what the conditional leaves unknown.

Now change one thing

Changed rule: if a form is approved, it has a stamp. Form X has no stamp. Assume no exceptions. Enter APPROVED or NOT-APPROVED.

Your work

What to finish

Test if-then reasoning record with the worked decisions and changed-case check.

Common mistake

Watch for this

Reversing a one-way condition or treating it as an “if and only if” rule.

How can I tell I understand it?

Apply a conditional rule without reversing it. Explain the evidence behind the result and correct any mismatch.

Try 3 questions

Quick knowledge check

Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.

Not yet passed

You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.

1If a device is charging, a light is on. The light is on. It can also light during testing. What follows?
2All approved passes carry a seal. This pass has no seal. With no exceptions, which conclusion follows?
3If a member is a captain, they can book equipment. Lee is not a captain. What follows?
0 of 3 answeredApply the lesson to a short question, then review the explanation.
2
Finish this lesson

Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.

Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.

Go to the knowledge check
Optional course overview video · same video as Lesson 1
CrashCourseHow to Argue - Philosophical Reasoning: Crash Course Philosophy #2YouTube
Optional course overview

How to Argue - Philosophical Reasoning: Crash Course Philosophy #2

From CrashCourse. Watch here or open it on YouTube .

Optional course overview. Follow the written steps below at your own pace.
Tools, templates, and lesson sources

Tools and templates

Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.

Sources and further reading

Explore the references behind this lesson.

OpenStax: Types of Inferences
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12

Inspected conditional forms, counterexamples, and deductive versus inductive inference.

Access: Public page or PDF inspected without payment or institutional sign-in on September 12, 2026. Optional external accounts are unnecessary for this course.

Reuse: Link and original paraphrase only. Public access does not grant blanket reuse; no provider text, figures, or exercises are reproduced.

Report a problem with this lesson

Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.

No sign-in needed.