The Life Starter
0 of 6 complete0%
Course Library · Lesson 5 of 6
Digital · Guided lesson

Test complete and interrupted paths

About 22 minutes · 4 reading + 18 practice and checks
Time includes reading, practice, and questions. Extra videos or further study are optional.
See this course’s project requirements

A tested fictional equipment-repair workflow with a transition table, guarded actions, rejected transitions and a trace of two complete cases.

Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.

What to include

  • A workflow map with distinct states and events.
  • A complete allowed-transition table and a rejection case.
  • A guarded verification matrix with accepted and rejected cases.
  • An impossible-event test with state preservation.
  • Complete, resumed and rejected workflow traces.
  • A tested finite workflow model with honest completion boundaries.

Review and revise

Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.

  • The implementation or declared simulation follows the supplied contract and retains inspectable original inputs.
  • Normal, boundary and rejected cases are recorded with expected versus observed results.
  • The changed case has a correct explanation and does not rely on hidden state.
  • The project includes source, outputs, instructions and honest tool, privacy and verification limits.
Open the full course project
Want more background?
Before you begin

The idea in everyday life

Successful path: triage, start_repair, verify True, close. Interrupted path: triage, start_repair, verify False.

The idea

Test a journey as a sequence of events, not only isolated pairs. An interrupted path stays at its last accepted state; a resume must use the current state instead of restarting history.

Follow along

Test complete and interrupted paths — original worked practice

Test a journey as a sequence of events, not only isolated pairs. An interrupted path stays at its last accepted state; a resume must use the current state instead of restarting history.

Successful path: triage, start_repair, verify True, close. Interrupted path: triage, start_repair, verify False.

  1. 1. Step 1

    Trace all four accepted steps.

    You should see: The complete path ends closed.

    This keeps the rule and its observable result together.

  2. 2. Step 2

    Trace interrupted path until failed verify.

    You should see: It remains repair.

    This keeps the rule and its observable result together.

  3. 3. Step 3

    Resume interrupted path with verify True and close.

    You should see: It ends tested then closed.

    This keeps the rule and its observable result together.

  4. 4. Step 4

    Keep both sequences and guard observations.

    You should see: Complete, resumed and rejected workflow traces.

    This keeps the rule and its observable result together.

Now change one thing

Start triaged; run start_repair then failed verify. Enter final state.

Your work

What to finish

Complete, resumed and rejected workflow traces.

Common mistake

Watch for this

Testing only the full happy path and leaving interrupted work or failed verification unexamined.

How can I tell I understand it?

Explain and demonstrate the required distinction: Test a journey as a sequence of events, not only isolated pairs. An interrupted path stays at its last accepted state; a resume must use the current state instead of restarting history. Show a changed input and the expected result without weakening this contract.

Try 3 questions

Quick knowledge check

Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.

Not yet passed

You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.

1What is final state of the interrupted path?
2How should the resume begin?
3Why do case-sequence tests add value?
0 of 3 answeredApply the lesson to a short question, then review the explanation.
5
Finish this lesson

Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.

Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.

Go to the knowledge check
Tools, templates, and lesson sources

Tools and templates

Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.

Sources and further reading

Explore the references behind this lesson.

docs.python.org — unittest.html
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01

Relevant documented module/API behavior inspected during expansion authoring; actual execution evidence is recorded separately. No grant eligibility is established.

Access: Official page retrieved with the web reader on 2026-10-01. Documentation reading does not certify execution in every native tool or browser.

Reuse: Original local practice files, fictional data, worked examples and questions. Concepts paraphrased and linked; source exercises are not copied.

Report a problem with this lesson

Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.

No sign-in needed.