Test linked assumptions
See this course’s project requirements
A fictional twelve-month accrual income forecast with demand/capacity drivers, cost behavior, seasonality, sensitivity and revision log.
Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.
What to include
- A feasible-unit and earned-revenue driver ledger.
- A twelve-month seasonal sales and capacity reconciliation.
- A cost-behavior and monthly profit bridge.
- A checked twelve-month income statement with annual bridge.
- A linked price/demand/cost sensitivity with twelve changed rows.
- An actual-versus-static/flexible profit bridge and revision log.
Review and revise
Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.
- Drivers: demand/capacity/price/cost assumptions are explicit.
- Aggregation: all 12 monthly rows reconcile annual profit.
- Scenarios: linked changes update rounding/capacity consistently.
- Evidence: actual/flexible/static bridges and historical revisions remain separate.
Want more background?
The idea in everyday life
Original fictional practice. All money is USD. No account, payment, personal record or outside participation is required. Original fictional service firm: monthly demand Jan.. Dec=80,90,100,110,120,130,140,150,160,170,180,190. Capacity 150 units/month; units=min(demand, capacity), no inventory/backlog. Each delivered unit earns 40 revenue and 22 variable cost; fixed operating expense 1,800/month and noncash depreciation 100/month. No interest, tax or owner withdrawal modeled. Revenue is earned on delivery, not payment arrival. January actual:90 units, price 38, variable cost 23/unit, fixed 1,800, depreciation 100. Linked price scenario: price 44, demand falls 10% rounded down to whole units, capacity 150; other costs initially fixed.
Changing price alone can overstate profit when demand also responds.
Test linked assumptions — complete worked case
Changing price alone can overstate profit when demand also responds.
Original fictional service firm: monthly demand Jan.. Dec=80,90,100,110,120,130,140,150,160,170,180,190. Capacity 150 units/month; units=min(demand, capacity), no inventory/backlog. Each delivered unit earns 40 revenue and 22 variable cost; fixed operating expense 1,800/month and noncash depreciation 100/month. No interest, tax or owner withdrawal modeled. Revenue is earned on delivery, not payment arrival. January actual:90 units, price 38, variable cost 23/unit, fixed 1,800, depreciation 100. Linked price scenario: price 44, demand falls 10% rounded down to whole units, capacity 150; other costs initially fixed.
Complete monthly drivers
Paste at A1.
| AMonth | BDemand | CCapacity | DUnits | ERevenue | FVariable cost | GFixed+depreciation | HProfit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80 | 150 | 80 | 3200 | 1760 | 1900 | -460 |
| 2 | 90 | 150 | 90 | 3600 | 1980 | 1900 | -280 |
| 3 | 100 | 150 | 100 | 4000 | 2200 | 1900 | -100 |
| 4 | 110 | 150 | 110 | 4400 | 2420 | 1900 | 80 |
| 5 | 120 | 150 | 120 | 4800 | 2640 | 1900 | 260 |
| 6 | 130 | 150 | 130 | 5200 | 2860 | 1900 | 440 |
| 7 | 140 | 150 | 140 | 5600 | 3080 | 1900 | 620 |
| 8 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 6000 | 3300 | 1900 | 800 |
| 9 | 160 | 150 | 150 | 6000 | 3300 | 1900 | 800 |
| 10 | 170 | 150 | 150 | 6000 | 3300 | 1900 | 800 |
| 11 | 180 | 150 | 150 | 6000 | 3300 | 1900 | 800 |
| 12 | 190 | 150 | 150 | 6000 | 3300 | 1900 | 800 |
Copy as plain text
1. 5.1 Test
Copy the linked 44 price/10% demand reduction rule and retain baseline.
You should see: Two linked drivers change.
2. 5.2 Test
Round down each reduced demand before applying 150 capacity.
You should see: Full twelve changed units, total 1,422.
3. 5.3 Test
Use 22 contribution and annual 22,800 pool to calculate 8,484.
You should see: Price gain and volume loss both counted.
4. 5.4 Test
Add variable cost 23 in a separate case:21 contribution and 7,062 profit.
You should see: Scenario dependency log names all changes.
What to finish
A linked price/demand/cost sensitivity with twelve changed rows.
Watch for this
Keeping old volume after the case states a demand response.
How can I tell I understand it?
Verify that your completed linked price/demand/cost sensitivity with twelve changed rows meets the three lesson-specific checks and retains the supporting original records.
Quick knowledge check
Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.
You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.
Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.
Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.
Go to the knowledge checkTools, templates, and lesson sources
Tools and templates
Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.
Sources and further reading
Explore the references behind this lesson.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
Read static versus actual-volume comparison and interpretation. Original January price/unit-cost decomposition replaces source cases.
Access: Public primary page body opened and relevant sections read through the web reader on 2026-10-01; no account required for reading.
Reuse: Original Life Starter cases, datasets and questions; no source exercise or worked dataset reproduced. Links support further reading.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
Read revenue/activity and variable/fixed operating budgets, noncash expense and income-statement assembly; all monthly driver values are original.
Access: Public primary page body opened and relevant sections read through the web reader on 2026-10-01; no account required for reading.
Reuse: Original Life Starter cases, datasets and questions; no source exercise or worked dataset reproduced. Links support further reading.
Report a problem with this lesson
Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.