Compare buildings with use and weather limits
See this course’s project requirements
A fictional building-energy brief with source/unit checks, whole-year site energy, floor-area intensity, fair comparison limits, anomaly questions and an evidence-based monitoring proposal.
Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.
What to include
- Save audited annual energy inventory and excluded-meter list; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
- Save fuel-specific conversion ledger and site total; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
- Save site EUI with boundary/period/no score label; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
- Save bounded building comparison and needed peer data; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
- Save source/site scenario comparison with factor limitations; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
- Save building energy inventory/conversion/EUI/source/comparison brief; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
Review and revise
Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.
- The final packet uses the supplied task-specific constraints and all six records agree.
- Every result can be traced to an identifier, input, calculation or stated decision rule.
- Changed-case practice updates dependent records and keeps holds or uncertainty visible.
- The packet states the learner role, authority boundary and specific next verification needed before real work.
Want more background?
The idea in everyday life
Original fictional workplace practice; paper or a local document is sufficient. The rules and records below are supplied for this exercise, not asserted universal workplace policy. Aspen A1,282,400 kBtu/20,000 ft²→64.12EUI. Aspen B1,400,000 kBtu/25,000 ft²→56EUI. A12 operating hours/day, B8; climate data unverified. B has larger total but lower intensity.No peer benchmark or weather adjustment performed.
Normalized energy per area allows a more useful comparison than total alone, but building use, hours, climate and weather can still differ.
Compare buildings with use and weather limits — worked practice
Normalized energy per area allows a more useful comparison than total alone, but building use, hours, climate and weather can still differ.
Aspen A1,282,400 kBtu/20,000 ft²→64.12EUI. Aspen B1,400,000 kBtu/25,000 ft²→56EUI. A12 operating hours/day, B8; climate data unverified. B has larger total but lower intensity.No peer benchmark or weather adjustment performed. Use paper or a local document. Preserve the original case and make a separate changed-case record.
1. Step 1
Calculate B EUI using its own boundary.
You should see: 1,400,000/25,000=56.
Keep the stated identifier, unit and policy alongside this result so another reader can check it.
2. Step 2
Compare total and intensity separately.
You should see: B total higher, but EUI lower by 8.12.
Keep the stated identifier, unit and policy alongside this result so another reader can check it.
3. Step 3
List context differences before efficiency claim.
You should see: Different hours and unverified climate/weather.
Keep the stated identifier, unit and policy alongside this result so another reader can check it.
4. Step 4
Save bounded building comparison and needed peer data.
You should see: Lower B EUI does not by itself prove better design or operation.
Keep the stated identifier, unit and policy alongside this result so another reader can check it.
What to finish
Save bounded building comparison and needed peer data; include the original-case decision evidence and a separate changed-case result.
Watch for this
Declaring the lower total or lower EUI a complete efficiency verdict without matched building context.
How can I tell I understand it?
Using the supplied identifiers, I can save bounded building comparison and needed peer data. My changed-case record names the revised condition and explains which dependent decision it changes.
Quick knowledge check
Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.
You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.
Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.
Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.
Go to the knowledge checkTools, templates, and lesson sources
Tools and templates
Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.
Sources and further reading
Explore the references behind this lesson.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
Public agency or educational context; no source exercises are copied and no simulated threshold is presented as an official rule. Page title and relevant content inspected; no interactive controls or credential process tested.
Access: Readable official page retrieved with the web reader on 2026-10-01.
Reuse: All teaching cases, data, worked steps and questions are original. Link and limited paraphrase for context; no copied source exercises.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
Public agency or educational context; no source exercises are copied and no simulated threshold is presented as an official rule. Page title and relevant content inspected; no interactive controls or credential process tested.
Access: Readable official page retrieved with the web reader on 2026-10-01.
Reuse: All teaching cases, data, worked steps and questions are original. Link and limited paraphrase for context; no copied source exercises.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
Occupational task and responsibility context; the exercise policies and quantities are original fictional inputs. Page title and relevant content inspected; no interactive controls or credential process tested.
Access: Readable official page retrieved with the web reader on 2026-10-01.
Reuse: All teaching cases, data, worked steps and questions are original. Link and limited paraphrase for context; no copied source exercises.
Report a problem with this lesson
Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.