The Life Starter
0 of 6 complete0%
Course Library · Lesson 5 of 6
Work · Guided lesson

Separate size from willingness to buy

About 14 minutes · 4 reading + 10 practice and checks
Time includes reading, practice, and questions. Extra videos or further study are optional.
See this course’s project requirements

A fictional market-research file with population/geography definitions, public-data source cards, a bounded customer-count range, contrary evidence and a demand-test question.

Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.

What to include

  • Define the target unit, behavior, geography and time period using the supplied cards.
  • Create source cards and reject mismatched geographic, time or mixed-unit comparisons.
  • Reproduce200 target people,180–220 population bounds and18–55 hypothetical participation.
  • Separate invented inputs, assumptions, official methods and unobserved demand.
  • Include free alternatives, limited comments and an unsent bounded next validation question.

Review and revise

Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.

  • Counts use compatible units and explicitly nonoverlapping geography.
  • Source cards distinguish observation period, publication date and unsupported trends.
  • Scenario arithmetic is reproducible and is not mislabeled as observed demand or a formal confidence interval.
  • The next-step recommendation includes contrary evidence and requires no external sale or contact.
Open the full course project
Want more background?
Before you begin

The idea in everyday life

Fictional service: a printed route-planning organizer for adult bicycle commuters in two nonoverlapping reachable zones, A and B. The organizer is a document product, not an approved cycling route, safety certification or promise of safer travel. All numbers below are invented teaching inputs, not Census findings about an actual town. Required work uses these supplied cards on paper or in a local document; no riding, customer contact, payment or external account is required. Additional fictional card C1: two free organizer templates already exist, but their uptake is unknown. Card C2: three unsolicited favorable comments about the idea have no sampling method or purchase offer. Neither card establishes paid willingness among the defined commuter population.

The idea

Market size and demand answer different questions. Secondary counts establish context; a proposed demand test should specify an observable decision, sample boundary and alternative explanations rather than merely ask for compliments.

Follow along

Separate size from willingness to buy — supplied practice

Market size and demand answer different questions. Secondary counts establish context; a proposed demand test should specify an observable decision, sample boundary and alternative explanations rather than merely ask for compliments.

Fictional service: a printed route-planning organizer for adult bicycle commuters in two nonoverlapping reachable zones, A and B. The organizer is a document product, not an approved cycling route, safety certification or promise of safer travel. All numbers below are invented teaching inputs, not Census findings about an actual town. Required work uses these supplied cards on paper or in a local document; no riding, customer contact, payment or external account is required. Additional fictional card C1: two free organizer templates already exist, but their uptake is unknown. Card C2: three unsolicited favorable comments about the idea have no sampling method or purchase offer. Neither card establishes paid willingness among the defined commuter population.

  1. 1. Separate the evidence types

    Classify M1 as population context, C1 as competing alternatives and C2 as limited comments.

    You should see: None is an observed count of paid purchases.

    A favorable comment and a population estimate have different evidential roles.

  2. 2. State contrary explanations

    List free alternatives, adequate existing methods and mismatch with the proposed format as possible reasons to decline.

    You should see: The brief includes at least three plausible demand constraints.

    Ignoring contrary explanations turns research into promotion.

  3. 3. Draft a bounded demand-test question

    Propose an optional authorized test asking eligible people to choose the organizer or their current/free alternative at a disclosed hypothetical price; define the response denominator.

    You should see: The draft specifies a decision and comparison, not only whether the idea sounds good.

    A choice with alternatives is more informative than an unbounded compliment question.

  4. 4. Keep draft and observation separate

    Label all recruitment, price and choice records as proposed, unsent and unobserved; do not claim purchases or consent.

    You should see: No test result is added to the baseline range.

    Writing a sensible test design does not perform the test.

Now change one thing

A changed sample contains10 eligible fictional respondents:3 choose the organizer,7 choose the free alternative. What percent chose the organizer within that sample?

Your work

What to finish

An evidence-type map, contrary-evidence list and unsent demand-test question.

Common mistake

Watch for this

Treating three favorable comments as a representative conversion rate for all200 target people.

How can I tell I understand it?

The demand-test proposal names a decision/denominator and remains unperformed.

Try 3 questions

Quick knowledge check

Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.

Not yet passed

You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.

1What do the original three favorable fictional comments establish?
2Which optional proposed question best examines a relevant decision?
3Why retain the free-template card in the fictional market brief?
0 of 3 answeredApply the lesson to a short question, then review the explanation.
5
Finish this lesson

Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.

Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.

Go to the knowledge check
Tools, templates, and lesson sources

Tools and templates

Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.

Sources and further reading

Explore the references behind this lesson.

SBA — market research and competitive analysis
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01

This official reference supports the mapped concepts. The supplied exercise inputs and operating rules are original fictional practice, not universal legal requirements or qualification evidence.

Access: redirected current official planning page; market-research section read on 2026-10-01; external resources are optional.

Reuse: Original fictional teaching and practice; source concepts paraphrased and linked, with no copied provider exercises.

FTC — evidence for marketing claims
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01

This official reference supports the mapped concepts. The supplied exercise inputs and operating rules are original fictional practice, not universal legal requirements or qualification evidence.

Access: readable official guidance on 2026-10-01; external resources are optional.

Reuse: Original fictional teaching and practice; source concepts paraphrased and linked, with no copied provider exercises.

Report a problem with this lesson

Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.

No sign-in needed.