Separate size from willingness to buy
See this course’s project requirements
A fictional market-research file with population/geography definitions, public-data source cards, a bounded customer-count range, contrary evidence and a demand-test question.
Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.
What to include
- Define the target unit, behavior, geography and time period using the supplied cards.
- Create source cards and reject mismatched geographic, time or mixed-unit comparisons.
- Reproduce200 target people,180–220 population bounds and18–55 hypothetical participation.
- Separate invented inputs, assumptions, official methods and unobserved demand.
- Include free alternatives, limited comments and an unsent bounded next validation question.
Review and revise
Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.
- Counts use compatible units and explicitly nonoverlapping geography.
- Source cards distinguish observation period, publication date and unsupported trends.
- Scenario arithmetic is reproducible and is not mislabeled as observed demand or a formal confidence interval.
- The next-step recommendation includes contrary evidence and requires no external sale or contact.
Want more background?
The idea in everyday life
Fictional service: a printed route-planning organizer for adult bicycle commuters in two nonoverlapping reachable zones, A and B. The organizer is a document product, not an approved cycling route, safety certification or promise of safer travel. All numbers below are invented teaching inputs, not Census findings about an actual town. Required work uses these supplied cards on paper or in a local document; no riding, customer contact, payment or external account is required. Additional fictional card C1: two free organizer templates already exist, but their uptake is unknown. Card C2: three unsolicited favorable comments about the idea have no sampling method or purchase offer. Neither card establishes paid willingness among the defined commuter population.
Market size and demand answer different questions. Secondary counts establish context; a proposed demand test should specify an observable decision, sample boundary and alternative explanations rather than merely ask for compliments.
Separate size from willingness to buy — supplied practice
Market size and demand answer different questions. Secondary counts establish context; a proposed demand test should specify an observable decision, sample boundary and alternative explanations rather than merely ask for compliments.
Fictional service: a printed route-planning organizer for adult bicycle commuters in two nonoverlapping reachable zones, A and B. The organizer is a document product, not an approved cycling route, safety certification or promise of safer travel. All numbers below are invented teaching inputs, not Census findings about an actual town. Required work uses these supplied cards on paper or in a local document; no riding, customer contact, payment or external account is required. Additional fictional card C1: two free organizer templates already exist, but their uptake is unknown. Card C2: three unsolicited favorable comments about the idea have no sampling method or purchase offer. Neither card establishes paid willingness among the defined commuter population.
1. Separate the evidence types
Classify M1 as population context, C1 as competing alternatives and C2 as limited comments.
You should see: None is an observed count of paid purchases.
A favorable comment and a population estimate have different evidential roles.
2. State contrary explanations
List free alternatives, adequate existing methods and mismatch with the proposed format as possible reasons to decline.
You should see: The brief includes at least three plausible demand constraints.
Ignoring contrary explanations turns research into promotion.
3. Draft a bounded demand-test question
Propose an optional authorized test asking eligible people to choose the organizer or their current/free alternative at a disclosed hypothetical price; define the response denominator.
You should see: The draft specifies a decision and comparison, not only whether the idea sounds good.
A choice with alternatives is more informative than an unbounded compliment question.
4. Keep draft and observation separate
Label all recruitment, price and choice records as proposed, unsent and unobserved; do not claim purchases or consent.
You should see: No test result is added to the baseline range.
Writing a sensible test design does not perform the test.
What to finish
An evidence-type map, contrary-evidence list and unsent demand-test question.
Watch for this
Treating three favorable comments as a representative conversion rate for all200 target people.
How can I tell I understand it?
The demand-test proposal names a decision/denominator and remains unperformed.
Quick knowledge check
Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.
You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.
Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.
Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.
Go to the knowledge checkTools, templates, and lesson sources
Tools and templates
Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.
Sources and further reading
Explore the references behind this lesson.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
This official reference supports the mapped concepts. The supplied exercise inputs and operating rules are original fictional practice, not universal legal requirements or qualification evidence.
Access: redirected current official planning page; market-research section read on 2026-10-01; external resources are optional.
Reuse: Original fictional teaching and practice; source concepts paraphrased and linked, with no copied provider exercises.
Source & access notes · checked 2026-10-01
This official reference supports the mapped concepts. The supplied exercise inputs and operating rules are original fictional practice, not universal legal requirements or qualification evidence.
Access: readable official guidance on 2026-10-01; external resources are optional.
Reuse: Original fictional teaching and practice; source concepts paraphrased and linked, with no copied provider exercises.
Report a problem with this lesson
Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.