Keep a repeatable personal access plan

About 29 minutes · 7 reading + 22 practice and checks

Time includes reading, practice, and questions. Extra videos or further study are optional.

See this course’s project requirements

A personal non-sensitive task card and scoped navigation test using text size, zoom, keyboard and an available screen reader, with a truthful fallback comparison when a reader is unavailable.

Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.

What to include

Create a task-based access choice with available/unavailable tools and no sensitive personal data.
Retain baseline/adjusted settings and observed information/control access, with restoration recorded.
Complete and document the keyboard task or its exact observed barrier.
Record an actual native setup/tutorial or a clearly labeled documentation-based fallback.
Produce a task outcome comparison that separates actual observations, expected structure, and unavailable checks.
Deliver a non-sensitive repeatable access plan with actual results, alternate route, and exact verification limits.

Review and revise

Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.

The implementation or declared simulation follows the supplied contract and retains inspectable original inputs.
Normal, boundary and rejected cases are recorded with expected versus observed results.
The changed case has a correct explanation and does not rely on hidden state.
The project includes source, outputs, instructions and honest tool, privacy and verification limits.

Open the full course project

Want more background?

Before you begin

The idea in everyday life

The original assistive-practice.html task is to find Morning 10:00, enter fictional nickname Nova with 2 seats, and confirm locally. Open the local HTML file in an available browser. assistive-task-card.txt supplies the record template; no account or private data is used.

The idea

A useful access plan names the task, chosen settings/method, observed barriers, restoration, and alternate route. It is a practical self-contained record, not an accessibility certification or medical assessment.

Follow along

Keep a repeatable personal access plan — original worked practice

1. Step 1
Combine the task card, zoom comparison, keyboard record, and reader/fallback path.
You should see: The same task is compared across available methods.
A useful access plan names the task, chosen settings/method, observed barriers, restoration, and alternate route. It is a practical self-contained record, not an accessibility certification or medical assessment.
2. Step 2
Write the preferred method and a backup route with exact settings or learned commands.
You should see: The plan can be repeated on the recorded device.
A useful access plan names the task, chosen settings/method, observed barriers, restoration, and alternate route. It is a practical self-contained record, not an accessibility certification or medical assessment.
3. Step 3
Run the optional artifact checker and label its five source assertions separately from native behavior.
You should see: Source structure evidence does not replace interaction evidence.
A useful access plan names the task, chosen settings/method, observed barriers, restoration, and alternate route. It is a practical self-contained record, not an accessibility certification or medical assessment.
4. Step 4
Save a non-sensitive plan locally or in My Proof as a project record; keep the original file in the learner’s own app.
You should see: A repeatable access plan with honest scope and unavailable checks.
A useful access plan names the task, chosen settings/method, observed barriers, restoration, and alternate route. It is a practical self-contained record, not an accessibility certification or medical assessment.

Your work

What to finish

Deliver a non-sensitive repeatable access plan with actual results, alternate route, and exact verification limits.

Common mistake

Watch for this

Turning a personal method plan or source check into universal accessibility or native-device certification.

How can I tell I understand it?

Demonstrate the rule: A useful access plan names the task, chosen settings/method, observed barriers, restoration, and alternate route. It is a practical self-contained record, not an accessibility certification or medical assessment. Use the supplied variant to distinguish a changed result from a broken implementation.

Finish this lesson

Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.

Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.

Go to the knowledge check

Tools, templates, and lesson sources

Tools and templates

Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.

Navigate Digital Tasks with Assistive Technology practice filesSupplied practice cases, a blank working record, complete lesson instructions, and annotated worked examples.

Your course project worksheetA downloadable text worksheet with each lesson’s working output, space for your answers, and the shared final-project checklist. Save your own copy.