The Life Starter
0 of 6 complete0%
Course Library · Lesson 6 of 6
Life · Guided lesson

Make a share-or-hold decision

About 27 minutes · 5 reading + 22 practice and checks
Time includes reading, practice, and questions. Extra videos or further study are optional.
See this course’s project requirements

A media-verification packet with a claim map, provenance trail, cue log, independent-channel check, claim-specific verdicts, and a share-or-hold note.

Keep your working files in your own notebook or software. Save a private description, checklist, and work link in My Proof.

What to include

  • Extract the event, place, time, and consequence claims.
  • Trace the fictional media history and separate reposts from independent sources.
  • Record cues with alternative explanations and detector limits.
  • Verify the request through a separately established channel.
  • Write claim-specific verdicts and a private sharing decision.

Review and revise

Use these criteria to check your work and choose what to improve.

  • Observations remain separate from inferred causes.
  • Source history and independent evidence are accurately traced.
  • Verdicts distinguish contradicted claims from unknown production methods.
  • The final action avoids unsupported claims and unnecessary amplification.
Open the full course project
Want more background?
Before you begin

The idea in everyday life

Final case P3: a clip claims the club canceled tomorrow’s event. Origin unknown; no reliable visual verdict; a previously saved official club notice says “Event continues at 4 p.m., room 3.” Three reposts cite the same unknown account. Task: prepare a private verification note and a corrected class-status sentence. Do not publish or contact anyone.

The idea

The goal is a responsible action, not winning an authenticity guessing game.

Follow along

Make a share-or-hold decision: guided practice

The goal is a responsible action, not winning an authenticity guessing game.

Use paper or a free local text editor. This is an original fictional practice case; do not submit its records to a real service. Start this lesson with these facts, even if an earlier variation changed them. Final case P3: a clip claims the club canceled tomorrow’s event. Origin unknown; no reliable visual verdict; a previously saved official club notice says “Event continues at 4 p.m., room 3.” Three reposts cite the same unknown account. Task: prepare a private verification note and a corrected class-status sentence. Do not publish or contact anyone.

  1. 1. Inventory evidence

    List claim, origin, independent notice, and repeated-source limitation.

    You should see: Unknown clip origin; three dependent reposts; official notice confirms continuation.

    A compact record prevents popularity from replacing corroboration.

  2. 2. Assign verdicts

    Separate operational claim from production method.

    You should see: Cancellation contradicted; synthetic origin unverified.

    The action can be clear even when the technical origin is unresolved.

  3. 3. Choose the action

    Select hold for the misleading clip and draft a supported replacement sentence.

    You should see: Hold the clip. Draft: the official notice lists the event at 4 p.m. in room 3.

    Shareable information should point to the reliable notice rather than amplify the false clip.

  4. 4. Assemble the packet

    Combine claim map, source trail, cue log, independent verification plan, verdict table, and sharing note.

    You should see: A six-part media verification packet with uncertainty preserved and no real personal data.

    A complete investigation can end with a hold or unresolved origin.

Now change one thing

Changed case: no independent source confirms a viral claim and the source remains unknown. Enter SHARE or HOLD for forwarding it as fact.

Your work

What to finish

Make a share-or-hold decision record with the worked decisions and changed-case check.

Common mistake

Watch for this

Reposting misleading or identifying content unnecessarily while trying to correct it.

How can I tell I understand it?

Build a verification note and choose a proportionate sharing action. Explain the evidence behind the result and correct any mismatch.

Try 3 questions

Quick knowledge check

Answer all 3 questions. Get at least 2 right and the lesson completes automatically.

Not yet passed

You’ll get an explanation for each answer. Signed in? Your results save to your account.

1A false clip contains identifying details about a private student. Which correction approach minimizes amplification?
2An official notice resolves event status but not whether the clip was AI-generated. What final action is possible?
3Which verification note is most reusable?
0 of 3 answeredApply the lesson to a short question, then review the explanation.
6
Finish this lesson

Pass the check. We’ll save the progress.

Answer all 3 questions above and get at least 2 right. You can review the explanations and try again.

Go to the knowledge check
Optional course overview video · same video as Lesson 1
Center for Media EngagementElection Misinformation Symposium: Fighting Misinfo Through Fact-checking and Deepfake DetectionYouTube
Optional course overview

Election Misinformation Symposium: Fighting Misinfo Through Fact-checking and Deepfake Detection

From Center for Media Engagement. Watch here or open it on YouTube .

Optional course overview. Follow the written steps below at your own pace.
Tools, templates, and lesson sources

Tools and templates

Tools open in a new tab so you can keep your place here.

Sources and further reading

Explore the references behind this lesson.

MIT Media Lab: Detect DeepFakes
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12

Inspected the project overview, limits of visual detection, and linked symposium video.

Access: Public page or PDF inspected without payment or institutional sign-in on September 12, 2026. Optional external accounts are unnecessary for this course.

Reuse: Link and original paraphrase only. Public access does not grant blanket reuse; no provider text, figures, or exercises are reproduced.

Kamali and colleagues: How to Distinguish AI-Generated Images from Authentic Photographs
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12

Inspected the primary preprint abstract: artifact categories, absent artifacts, and difficulty of provenance without context.

Access: Public page or PDF inspected without payment or institutional sign-in on September 12, 2026. Optional external accounts are unnecessary for this course.

Reuse: Link and original paraphrase only. Public access does not grant blanket reuse; no provider text, figures, or exercises are reproduced.

Stanford: Digital Literacy in the Age of AI
Source & access notes · checked 2026-09-12

Inspected lateral reading, upstream checking, reverse-image searching, and the distinction between existing interventions and ongoing AI research.

Access: Public page or PDF inspected without payment or institutional sign-in on September 12, 2026. Optional external accounts are unnecessary for this course.

Reuse: Link and original paraphrase only. Public access does not grant blanket reuse; no provider text, figures, or exercises are reproduced.

Report a problem with this lesson

Tell us what went wrong. Please leave out personal information and private project contents.

No sign-in needed.